Commit him by executive order, Joe!
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
319 points (98.2% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3858 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
An actually horrifying thought
This is one of the things where it sounds obviously unconstitutional, but I would not bet money on the fact that it actually is.
Of course it’s blatantly unconstitutional, one cannot be denied due process, see 14th amendment. However, that is not the poignant question. What matters is: does anyone of consequence and power give a flying shit anymore?
Just send Trump to Gitmo. There's no due process there, so there's no problem!
Would that not mean Baker acting someone is unconstitutional yet occurs daily and has for decades yet not a flying fuck has been given?
Joe could throw trump in prison without due process and probably tie it up in courts for at least a few weeks.
Biden should throw Trump in jail, then say he has immunity since he's the president. Trump either has to take it, or set precedent against his own cases.
A tiny part of me is hoping the supreme court does rule that presidents are immune and then biden just fucking drone strikes Mar-a-Lago and resigns before they can indict him.
Biden could even argue in good faith, that he did it to protect democracy.
This is why the supreme court cannot find that. Because that would mean the Dems have only one option left and that would be doing it first.
If SCOTUS does the unexpected and rules a president has absolute immunity? Yeah, I would do this the very next moment.
I mean... how else would you describe this?
Jesus fuck.
What the absolute gucking timeline of fuck
FTFY
Committed to a supermax.
This election is gonna be a lot of elder abuse, and everyone is gonna suffer.
We really need a fucking age limit or at least a dementia test...
Oh, is that a surprise somehow Vanityfare?
Well, according to Trump, you can make that happen
5150 him like YayO!
Then they started flinging spoons of Jell-O at each other.
Just kidding. I know Joe's a raging bull, etc...etc...
Joe's old and moves slow, Donald's old and has a clinically diagnosable personality disorder. Trump does not share a reality with the rest of us
Joe’s old and moves slow
So is a glacier but they can ground down entire mountains
Trump does not share a reality with the rest of us
And still there are too many that want to be part of his alternative reality
Would be interesting if the rest of the campaigns took place in the same senior care facility.
Just shuffle all of the "leadership" off, scuffling amongst themselves. Include McConnell, honestly probably Pelosi, Grassley. Eventually they'll get distracted by board games or whatever and we can figure out next steps.
I've said before that their debates will be reminiscent of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, not because of the high oratory, but because they both think they remember them.
lets not get into mental acuity fighting, no one is ganna win there. This is just some BS middle school shit, just beat the other on the issues. And for fucking once maybe try doing the things you promise on the campaign trail, I mean you know he will, he will be dictator for a day, then maybe just a few more, you know when it feels right to give the power back.
There is a very very clear winner here. It might be the one eyed man being king in the country of the blind, but it's no contest at all.