A bunch of environmental destruction comes from industrial farming too, though, so overall no farmers would be a net positive for the environment.
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
133 points (90.8% liked)
Gauchiasses
452 readers
14 users here now
Nous sommes
Nous ne sommes
Mais le plus important
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
we should probably encourage the farmers to do their work outside the environment.
Mars? Or were you thinking more along the lines of the Alpha Centauri neighborhood?
TBH I’m not really sure. I know there is a ship there though. Well part of a ship.
No farmers > no cities
It would be positive as fuck for the environment!
dont missunderstood me, i clearly agree ;)
The environmental farmers exists, they are not showned,
Even the Agroecology is not a common word, today,
Wow, hot take. I imagine you're the first person in the lineup to starve to death, ahead of all those brown folks, eh.
Oh you're spicy. Did you think I actually believe we should all just lie down and die? Like yeah I have days where that's pretty high on my agenda, but I definitely prefer the current status quo of us slowly extinguishing ourselves in a hell of our own making. xoxo
In Indiana, some farmers protest windmills. I don't understand.
Our agricultural systems are artificially propped up by fertilizer usage. Those fertilizers are poisoning the water table, which we depend on for most of our biological functions as mammals. Agriculture has allowed our populations to explode. This won't end well.
So you're saying the environment is our enemy and we should conquer it?
how do you understand that