this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
662 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

32109 readers
695 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Protesters who wear masks could face arrest, up to a month in jail and a £1,000 fine under proposed measures that human rights campaigners claim are pandering to “culture war nonsense”.

Police in England and Wales will be given the power to arrest people if they are wearing face coverings at specific demonstrations, the Home Office has said."

Been a bad 18 months or so for privacy in the UK. Online Safety Bill passed, the right to take strike action curtailed, people in receipt of benefits (including disabled people) will soon (as from 2025) have their bank accounts open to the government, the right to protest curtailed and now this.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What if you're feeling unwell?

[–] Dra@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Face paint and glasses to break up facial recognition

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] Xavier@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hmm… I may be mistaken but can they not already arrest troublemakers, arsonists, violent/aggressive individuals and other sort of rioters/agitators with preexisting laws/bylaws/regulations ?

On the other hand, I'm trying to see the silver lining here… perhaps this new law will make it difficult for agent provocateur¹ from operating without repercussions and anonymity unless the law specifically has a carve out for them (I wouldn't be too surprised, but it would be another major blow to the resiliency of democracy in the United Kingdom).

Source: Pentney, K. (2021). Licensed to kill…discourse? agents provocateurs and a purposive right to freedom of expression. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 39(3), 241-257

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 months ago

Police discretion will already make an exception for them even it's not explicitly carved out, there is no silver lining, it's just more police state shit

[–] fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm sure there'll be a carve-out to the mask prohibition. I mean, what if there's protest action a minister/police department dislikes? They need a way for their agents to don confiscated Nazi paraphernalia before joining the event to poison its media coverage, while remaining unidentifiable as state actors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Protesters who wear masks could face arrest, up to a month in jail and a £1,000 fine under proposed measures that human rights campaigners claim are pandering to “culture war nonsense”.

Police in England and Wales will be given the power to arrest people if they are wearing face coverings at specific demonstrations, the Home Office has said.

The move is in direct response to the four protesters being cleared of criminal damage after toppling a statute of slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol in 2022 .

Ministers will also make climbing on war memorials a specific public order offence, carrying a three-month sentence and a £1,000 fine.

Shami Chakrabarti, the human rights lawyer and peer, said: “Should rape victims or refugees peacefully protesting really be punished for covering their faces to protect their identities?

The home secretary, James Cleverly, said that recent protests had seen “a small minority dedicated to causing damage and intimidating the law-abiding majority”.


The original article contains 681 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] urfavlaura@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

that has been forbidden in Germany for years

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›