this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
288 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
2914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 9 months ago (6 children)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Samsung Boss said:

As soon as you have sensors to capture something, you reproduce [what you’re seeing], and it doesn’t mean anything. There is no real picture.

A Polaroid photograph is a real picture, in the sense that it exists as a single, definitive, physical thing. Whether what it shows is real is a different question, though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I don't really understand what is unethical about AI photo edit to begin with? Like photo editing before AI existed and you could make anything you want with a ps.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because it's not automatic and is outside of the user's control, to start.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago
[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Besides potential copyright infringement, there isn't really any issue with it I'd say. This is still an incredibly stupid take from Samsung however.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Im 14 and this is deep

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›