Futurology

1670 readers

79 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 7 months ago by Espiritdescali@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BaylorSwift3@futurology.today 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This idea seems economically illiterate. In a world where humans don't earn money, how do we have a stock market supporting these valuations?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

I can't get the page to load, but I'm guessing it would be stock owners paying other stock owners for things with stock dividends.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

We don't. At the end of the day the world still needs people its just that the roles and responsibilities change a bit.

Honestly "AI" is way over hyped. It will cause a few changes but not the wide spread revolution that some people think.

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Sam Altman. The crook. Sounds feasible. Wouldn't touch anything with his stink on it

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Until the org needs an ISO or SOC certification. Than you must have clearly defined rolls and responsibilities

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah that's not going to happen. "AI" is way over hyped and is not that big of change.