this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
22 points (89.3% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
287 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/14641130

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Canada's Federal Court has overturned a decision granting refugee status to an American transgender woman who successfully argued that a combination of gun culture and rising transphobia left her at risk of persecution in the United States.

In a decision released this week, Judge Christine Pallotta said the Refugee Appeal Division erred in finding Colorado authorities were incapable of protecting Daria Bloodworth from a roommate she accused of stalking her — and that her safety couldn't be guaranteed elsewhere in the U.S.

"It was made pretty clear from the get go that this was going to be an uphill battle — winning this thing, or even staying in Canada a little bit longer and not get murdered in the U.S.," Bloodworth told the CBC.

Bloodworth came to Canada in 2019, seeking refugee protection in relation to claims that she was the target of threats and violence from a former roommate, her former landlord and a debt collection agency.

"The RPD failed to consider how Colorado's open carry gun laws combined with the general climate of anti-trans hatred growing in the US could make [her] perpetually vulnerable and at risk to her life," Mohan wrote.

The federal court ruling also says the appeal division failed to determine that internal flight was impossible — saying that "more than evidence demonstrating hardship and disadvantage" was needed to take New York City off the list.


The original article contains 834 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It makes sense to me that this person would feel unsafe in many parts of the US, and is likely at risk in their hometown. But I think the judge is right, America is a huge place, if you aren't safe in a conservative town you could move to a safer place in a different part of America.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also, Canada is a large place.

Being LGBT+ in a large city is very different than being LGBT+ in a town/city that's full of rig pigs.

[–] DariaBloodworth@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Hell, Trinidad is more "full of rig pigs" than Fort Collins.

[–] DariaBloodworth@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hi, I'm the person the story's about.

Fort Collins is a college town in one of the few states that theoretically offer "full protections" for trans Americans. It's not "a conservative town". Might be a bit more conservative than Boulder, as it's the home of Colorado State University (formerly Colorado A&M) but it's not that much more conservative.

Also, I moved to Colorado for a reason, and it's because their laws purportedly protect transgender people fully. Shame that wasn't actually the case.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You are going to appeal this up the chain right? Regardless of what happens in the court case I hope you can find somewhere to live and be yourself, safely.

[–] DariaBloodworth@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

The Federal Courts Act impairs my ability to take it to the Federal Court of Appeal. But still, there are concerns regarding principles of natural justice with this federal court decision that could allow me to certify a question that could challenge that particular section of the Federal Courts Act.

But yes. I will fight this case to the bitter end.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

With the way Canadian politics are going right now, it would be pretty hypocritical to accept trans refugees.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

former roommate, former landlord, and a debt collection agency

So she's actually just trying to run from debt because she was a bum roommate it would seem. This is the right call, shit isn't good, but nowhere near bad enough to warrant giving refugee status to any American. Otherwise would be smack in the face of refugees who ACTUALLY need asylum.

[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You mean the same roommate who has been stalking her with a shotgun?

[–] dlpkl@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Do you have proof that the roommate was stalking her with a shotgun, or are you just making assumptions? The article only mentions that she was threatened with the gun once, and makes no mention of subsequent occasions including any firearms.

Edit: a quick Google search of "Daria bloodworth shotgun" returns no results. Did you just invent the detail of it being a shotgun?

[–] DariaBloodworth@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

The police reports in the tribunal's record. But they don't post that part on CanLII. But the RAD did affirm that this was true (para. 51).

[–] DariaBloodworth@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

That debt collection agency thing is a bit of an irritating aside, but since that part keeps getting covered, I'll address it here.

Back in 2020, I was getting increasingly vile and harassing e-mails from someone who purported to be from a debt collection agency. I forwarded that correspondence to the RPD. It was not part of my original claim. However, it would later turn out that this was not from a legitimate debt collection agency but rather, the result of a data breach. It was a scam e-mail.