this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
212 points (99.5% liked)

/kbin meta

4 readers
1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

@pollodiabolo - this user is a karma whore of epic proportions and they have made a shit load (10-15+) accounts on kbin that boost and upvote each other while sometimes mass downvoting others that have posts trending towards the top - all to farm karma.

See top comment on this thread

You will continue to see me calling out this person and their alts. This can't and won't become another Reddit and karma whoring folks need to be called out and discouraged.

The following accounts are all the same person and in the very unlikely event they are not, they are still collectively vote manipulating.

@pollodiabolo @journalism_died @ishitwhite @muftiboy @kilkennygriffin @jeremyfurzen @syscollapse @riseupagainstthem @ruse-of-metacarpi @johnson_waters @cazzodicristo @at-fieldu @the-big-lie @Schluchtschiss @fuckoffyoudumbcunt @extremelybullish @cringeminge4 @NoCunteryForOldMen @yesbabyyy @kneel_pleb

A few of these accounts have since cleared their boosting history but with some common sense it should be easy to verify.

If I get mass downvoted, be sure to see the age of the accounts as well as whether they are on this list to gauge their authenticity. I am pretty sure this won't reach many but I'll spam it enough times so it eventually will.

EDIT: This is not a comprehensive list and there are obviously more alts. These are beyond a reasonable doubt involved in mass self-upvoting.

EDIT2: Almost every downvote I have on this post are by accounts that were made after I posted this. They all belong to the same user that I have called out here. This is pathetic and should be proof enough that vote manipulation is something we need to deal with.

EDIT3: More accounts to add to the list: @puny_human @latvianbloke @pedanticc @SONOFNAT

EDIT4: And now they've started to remove their downvotes from new accounts and add them from the list. Bruh I don't even get it at this point. I'm just gonna go to bed that person's a headache to figure out honestly. Night y'all.

Name and shame karma farmers.

EDIT5: This is an excellent example, you might see some familiar names

Image in case they decide to retract their votes again

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minnieo@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

In that thread, I saw someone had an idea that maybe rep should cap off, like if you reach over say 5000, it would just display 5000+ or something and I thought that could be a decent solution. That would discourage people from posting with the goal of increasing rep, and encourage people to post just because they want to participate in the conversation.

I'm sure there are more elegant ways to deal with it, and perhaps we should have that discussion. The fact that you can give a post 3 upvotes (upvote = 1 boost = 2) makes it really easy for someone to rep-farm if they wanted too. Perhaps upvotes/boosts from accounts with the same IP shouldn't count toward rep?

EDIT: I made a script that removes user reputation from their profile, and the profile popups upon hovering usernames. Sitewide removal. Navigate Kbin unbiased.

[–] StopMassDownvotingYouIdiot@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Echoing this, that was an excellent suggestion by @Catch42. There should be capped karma and magazine specific karma.

Link to comment

[–] RheingoldRiver@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

That sounds AMAZING and I'd like to refine it a bit more. On reddit you could see karma breakdown by subreddit which was useful to see where people were most active. So what about:

  • total karma up to say 5000 or so
  • percent breakdown of total karma by magazine

So if you have say 10,000 karma from kbinMeta and 5000 karma from all other magazines combined it says like reputation: 5000+ and then breakdown: kbinMeta - 67%, askKbin - 10%, etc etc

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This all seems needlessly complicated, and worse, it is custom-tweaked to just one specific scenario. I would much rather simply have the details of who voted for whom remain public and then allow each instance to handle that however they wish.

Spotting karma whores who operate like this, with a group of mutually-upvoting and downvoting bots, will be a trivial pattern for automatic detection. Rather than simply trying to give them an ever-more-complicated "game" to play, just identify them and block them and be done with it. Admins won't want their instances to become known as havens for such behaviour so they'll likely wipe users like that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Catch42@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the shout out. It seems that the original thread was deleted, so I'll re-explain my idea here. The capped overall karma is to remove the incentive to grind for reputation points. There is fundamentally no point to them, but there is clearly some psychological need driving us to want more of them. This should help with karma farmers.

The magazine specific reputation points is so that people can tell when a troll has entered their specific magazine. A troll would have high overall reputation but in your magazine it would be very low, which allows for them to be quickly identified and banned.

@RheingoldRiver I like your idea of a percent breakdown, but it wouldn't help magazines identify spammers. A spammer can create an unlimited number of magazines with legitimate sounding names and spread out their grinding among them. The percent breakdown would look normal unless someone really dug into it.

What I don't have a solution for is creating an incentive structure that discourages shills from creating alt accounts in order to gain more influence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm increasingly convinced that general reputation points should just go. They're not about reputation at all. They're about making social media more addictive.

Large positive scores are meaningless without knowing where they came from. And even then, they can be farmed. Same for large negative ones.

What do people actually use the score for? To determine whether some else is worth engaging with? 9 times out of 10, you can tell just from the post - people acting in bad faith are pretty easy to spot. If someone's being a prick, they can be ignored even if they're usually a level headed and nice person 99% of the time. If someone's JAQing off, or sea-lioning, they'll make it known in short order.

A number doesn't tell us what to do about it.

Breakdowns by group is a good idea. Maybe expand that idea to give a count of posts and comments by group, too. Not necessarily viewable by everyone, but at least by mods and admins.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've seen many forums do tier rating systems for posters, so you didn't see any numbers but more of a generalized ranking from Novice to Veteran. The rank names shouldn't imply anything other than experience in posting, so avoid things like "Expert". It still gives some credence to a poster who has a high rank, but doesn't mean much beyond a flair. Much like Reddit trophies of account age...great, you've been here ten years, what did you do with it?

The argument then shifts to where the lines of rank are, but I don't think that's too important, although honestly if you can post for a month and become a Seasoned Veteran it might be too low. (Thinking of you, Frontier. Not every player should be Elite.)

The boost thing is something different. I like the idea of its supposed function, to push updated or valued content into the feeds more, but clearly the user manual needs work. Should we just have the same as everyone else with an up and down vote, where the upvote does a boost and counts towards rank, while a downvote is simply a visual of either disagreement or unfavorable content but doesn't do much (maybe drops the post lower but that's it).

[–] minnieo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like the sound of that. Something like Novice/Newcomer > Regular > Senior > Veteran > Seasoned or something. I also don't mind a sort of star ranking system that upvotes contribute to, but no numbers to strive for, only good contributions.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I agree, Internet points are just useless. The points should be useful in seeing the popularity of a given post or comment, but in judging a user's contribution? I dealt with trolls and assholes with 50-100k karma back in Reddit, it's not an indication of the quality of a user, just the amount of time they spent in popular subs posting popular content.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nefarious@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If possible, I think the karma/rep score should be completely hidden. As long as people can see a number, they're going to try and game it somehow, which incentivizes low quality posts. You can cap total karma, but people will still try to grind up to 5000 and they'll still try to get the highest comment scores they can. That encourages people to make the types of low-effort posts and jokes that often clog up Reddit threads.

The other problem with an overall rep score is that it doesn't truly represent user behavior. If 1/3 of my posts are shitty troll posts, but the other 2/3 are generic low-effort joke posts and memes that people will upvote by default, my rep will stay positive even though I'm a net negative contributor. Likewise, if I make one really popular post that gets 90,000 upvotes, my score will stay positive pretty much forever, even if I troll and harass people nonstop.

So rather than report the sum of a user's post scores, I would propose displaying a "user quality" indicator based on the average score of their recent posts instead. For example, if your average is greater than 5, you'd get a green up arrow, and if your average is less than -5, you'd get a red down arrow, but otherwise you get a neutral icon. You could have other icons for higher and lower scores, but I feel like that might still encourage people to try to game the system, so I'd propose keeping it simple and making it easy enough to get the green icon that you're not incentivized to spend any time on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

You seem to have struck a chord...

All three (make that 4) downvotes are from accounts younger than this post.

Some new accounts to add to the list:

@latvianbloke

@puny_human

@pedanticc

...

@SONOFNAT

[–] minnieo@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How many damn emails does this person have? Lmfao

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

If you spend a few bucks to register a domain name?

A number only limited to your self-control (and self-respect) to rig votes that give you nothing IRL.

So, for this person, I am guessing hundreds.

[–] CoWizard@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To say it gives you nothing IRL is ignorant of the online social engineering these platforms can do

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ignorant?

This whole thread is an example of people who are very aware of what is possible with social engineering online and calling it out on a new platform in an attempt to at least slow the influx.

The person who is creating accounts like the energiser bunny hitting the skins is trying to use reddit tactics that have been well known since that crow vs corvid user was found boosting their content.

The difference here is that, since votes are public, their attempts are very transparent.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Pamasich@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

No need, gmail gives you virtually infinite emails. Just tested it out, kbin doesn't have countermeasures against it in place. You can use one gmail email to create as many accounts as you want.

[–] StopMassDownvotingYouIdiot@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup bahahah, I already expected that. Those are rookie numbers - this person is on another level and there are a LOT more to come. I'd love to see how long they waste their life on this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StopMassDownvotingYouIdiot@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Here come the downvotes - 4 downvotes, 3 of which are from accounts that were made after I posted this. What a loser lmfao I can't get over it this is fucking hilarious. This is pathetic and should be proof enough that vote manipulation is something we need to deal with.

[–] StopMassDownvotingYouIdiot@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And now they've started to remove their downvotes. I don't even get it at this point. I'm just gonna go to bed that person's a headache to figure out honestly.

[–] onepinksheep@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the moron didn't realise downvotes were public?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] static@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have not looked into the details, but this makes a solid case for public up/downvotes, it makes fuckery public.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Definitely. The public nature of voting means that it should be possible for anyone to write a bot that spots these patterns automatically.

Whether instance admins do anything about it is a separate matter, but at least everyone will know whether they're doing something about it.

[–] minnieo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I was on the fence about the voting being public, some people may not wanna get shit for agreeing with one point or another was one point I saw (they may not feel they can vote freely) but it certainly does force accountability.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Wow, would you take a look at the accounts who reduced this post. It's almost like they saw it as a roll-call.

[–] contextual_somebody@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] StopMassDownvotingYouIdiot@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Its concerning that kbin might turn into Reddit with low effort shitposts hitting the front page most of the time because a few people decide to make tons of accounts and boost their posts early on to take advantage of the algorithm. They absolutely are a dork ass loser for ruining what could be a good thing - all for fake internet points, sheesh.

[–] minnieo@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Thankfully the 'algorithm' of kbin is not near as toxic and shitty, it's a lot more simplistic and authentic. I like how comments with varying amounts of upvotes are displayed mixed up so I feel like I am actually experiencing a discussion involving everyone.

[–] static@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Upvotes are public, on kbin/not lemmy.

With public upvotes bots should be detectable, I just have to write a bot to detect the bots.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] asteroidrainfall@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I think this is one argument in favor of having public boost/favorite lists, either on a post level or account level. Might help expose karma farming.

[–] princessofcute@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's dumb is reputation doesn't even do anything on Kbin right now other than make you go "haha I have higher number than you" so reputation farming is a total waste of time. Personally I hope it stays that way as it will deter the farmers, I can see some of the benefits of the karma system in Reddit but it's just too prone to manipulation to be actually useful in any way.

[–] atocci@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It didn't do anything on reddit either as far as I'm aware, and yet people still went for it like they were trying to get the high score.

[–] princessofcute@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was sometimes used for posting, like you had to have a certain amount of karma to post in certain subs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ozen@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you could make a small amount of money for selling a reddit account with high karma...but that's the only thing I ever heard of it being useful for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StopMassDownvotingYouIdiot@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"haha I have higher number than you"

This is exactly what some people are after. It lets them believe they are oh so better for having no life outside of the internet. And content quality on kbin suffers in the process.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Back in the Fark days, it was, "I have a lower number than you!" (an older account). People will always find something to latch onto.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CynAq@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I would have blocked a lot of them just looking at the vile usernames. Thanks for the headsup.

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would follow a Magazine dedicated to this. I think it would benefit the Fediverse in the long run.

Edit: Also I find it funny that you call out a user for have 10-15 accounts, and that matches the current downvote number almost exactly.

[–] 0xtero@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it would be useful to change Reputation points into two words "Positive" if > 0 and "Negative" if < 0 and leave it at that.

There's really no need to keep the points because it only feeds stupid behavior like this.
It's gamification of discussions in a place that doesn't need it - we're not hungry for MAU stats, no one cares about MAU because we don't have venture capitalists funding the service.

Get rid of Reputation points.
Use upvote/downvotes solely for page/thread sorting purposes.

Just like Mastodon has done some design choices (like not allowing re-posting with quotes), I think the threadiverse needs to have similar thoughts about the posting culture we want to cultivate.

[–] HorreC@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (10 children)

all those accounts come back 404, maybe admins are on your side on this and took care of the issue.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] CatBookCat@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

is it weird that i don't care? i don't care about oodles karma. 0 fucks to give. why do people care?

[–] DoucheAsaurus@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Dude is just some tool trying to play the same games he played on reddit. Deserves an IP ban if you ask me.

[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I do care because even though these virtual point mean fuck all, users will degrade everyone's experience to try and farm them. We'll be getting low quality, rage-bait inducing posts, reposts being boosted to the top and actual good content being overshadowed just because an arsehole wants bigger numbers

[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Well, when all your posts will start with a minus 5 and become invisible maybe you will start to care? Because you WILL have your haters too. Some people are that crazy.

load more comments
view more: next ›