this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
93 points (91.2% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2488 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In an interim judgment delivered on Friday, the president of the court, Joan Donoghue, said Israel must “take all measures within its power” to prevent acts that fall within the scope of the genocide convention and must ensure “with immediate effect” that its forces do not commit any of the acts covered by the convention.

The court stopped short of granting South Africa’s request to order an immediate ceasefire to the war, which has destroyed much of the Gaza Strip and killed more than 25,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities.

The ruling is not the final word from the court on whether Israel’s actions amount to genocide, but it provides a strong indication that the judges believe there is a credible risk to Palestinians under the genocide convention. Granting South Africa’s application for special measures, the court did not have to find whether Israel had committed genocide, which will be determined at a later date, but only that its acts were capable of falling within the genocideconvention and that urgent preventive action was necessary.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

So many pedantic asshats on lemmy who spend hours arguing about which word to use. We're witnessing an unprecedented loss of innocent lives on a massive scale, and it's being treated like a fucking reality tv show on the global stage. These are real people with families, careers, dreams... Just like the rest of us.

I honestly don't care what we call it. Just stop murdering civilians.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Overview of the pedanticism: The ultimate question here is whether Israel is guilty of genocide, or mere war crimes. The whole thing hinges on intent, which will have to be proven, which is why it is expected that the ICJ will take years to reach a verdict. A whole international court, 16 judges, uncountably many lawyers, years.

Commenters here trying to adjudicate that distinction between wanking sessions is, frankly speaking, presumptuous. From both sides.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So many pedantic asshats on lemmy who spend hours arguing about which word to use.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I can see how the hilariously ignorant would think there are a lot of pedants on Lemmy

[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Guess you've got me all figured out.

[–] Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Ya know what word has lost all meaning? "Antisemetic." Last I heard it wasn't defined as "anything the current government of Israel disagrees with." But the current government sure wants it to be defined that way. I wonder how those who have actually faced antisemetism feel about it.

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Must we truly wait until 2200 for the United Nations to be useful and glorious...?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“The court is also of the view that Israel must take measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to the members of the Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip,” the US judge said.

“The court further considers that Israel must take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.”

Yoav Gallant, Israel’s defence minister, whose call for a total siege of Gaza as part of a battle against “human animals” was noted by the court on Friday, said the ICJ had “granted South Africa’s antisemitic request”.

It recalls that the military operation conducted by Israel after 7 October 2023 has resulted inter alia in tens of thousands of deaths and injuries and the destruction of homes, schools, medical facilities and other vital infrastructure, as well as displacement on a massive scale.

The 1948 genocide convention, enacted after the mass murder of Jews in the Nazi Holocaust, defines it as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.

A Reuters report on Thursday said the director of the US CIA and his Israeli counterpart would meet Qatari officials in the coming days for talks on a second potential Gaza hostage deal and a pause in fighting.


The original article contains 1,066 words, the summary contains 238 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!