this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
39 points (72.4% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4171 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ooboontoo@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would I prefer another candidate? Sure. Will I vote for Biden, especially against Trump? With alacrity!

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 33 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I notice the talking points have shifted around to "the Democrats all wanted it to be someone else" in the last couple of days. It's the kind of fact-free criticism that can worm its way into people's minds and is tough to counteract.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

OP constantly posts that talking point.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've decided to start using "block" like a Usenet killfile -- basically it doesn't have to be a big deal, just someone whose content I'd prefer not to see.

I blocked them, realized I couldn't reply to you with this message once I did, then unblocked them, and plan to reblock right after sending this.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Gotta get your blocks in 😉 (I understand)

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People burying their head in the sand wont change his numbers.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Yes, look at these terrible numbers.

If I didn't know any better, I'd say he could win on that poll just based on the margin of error.

But oh so terrible numbers.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A shitload of democrats and just about all independents to the left of the DNC (which is millions if not tens of millions of potential voters) DID want someone else and still do, though.

Especially since he's stubbornly refusing to depart from his unconditional support for the Israeli apartheid regime even as more and more voters do.

Disclaimer: I'm not saying that he's not a MUCH lesser evil than Trump or that anyone who can shouldn't vote for him.

That doesn't mean that he's above criticism or universally popular amongst everyone to the left of the fascist GOP. Which are supposed to be the people he's representing.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A shitload of democrats...

That's always true in every election, and should be. If it were most Democrats, someone might have beat Biden in the primaries, but they won't.

I'm getting old. Biden is the farthest left president of my lifetime and there's no major candidate running to his left this year.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

If it were most Democrats, someone might have beat Biden in the primaries

No way to know for sure since the primaries are controlled by the party leadership, all of whom are firmly pro-Biden and some of whom have been known to rig the contests in favor of their preferred candidates before.

I'm getting old. Biden is the farthest left president of my lifetime

No. Even Obama was further left and he was very much a Clintonite too.

Some of Congress and some on Biden's cabinet (most of which were appointed on the advice of others) are further left, but Biden himself is just barely to the left of Joe Manchin.

there's no major candidate running to his left this year.

Because they're literally not allowed to by the DNC leadership.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Someone else" sure. But not anyone on the ballot. For me they'd need to be both more progressive AND have a shit's chance of beating Trump. Bernie maybe but he's not going to pull centrist votes nor will he dodge the age question. Biden is, unfortunately, our best shot at retaining democracy for another 4 years.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Bernie could have done it in 2016 and in 2020, but not this round. Biden did actually win the big party, so you stick with the horse that runs.

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Bernie couldn't even win the Democratic primary, how was he gonna win the general?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Bernie was running away with it both times, before ratfuckery ensued. You can live in denial of it, but whatever, it happened.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Bernie wasn't running away with it in 2016. I say this as someone who voted for Bernie in both 2016 and 2020. Bernie put up an amazing showing for an old socialist from Vermont against the DNC's crown princess with some 30+ years of national fame and name recognition, but he was never in serious reach of the nomination.

In 2020 he was very close, but he got outplayed, unfortunately, by the moderates who united against him, and the other progressive in the race who chose to stay in and split the vote and crush what chance he had.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. And yet no one can name an alternative.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No one can name an alternative

(disclaimer am not American) I say Biden is fine for the US despite his faults and mistakes, but President Sanders would be the best alternative if the world could have one.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I’d also prefer a 9” wang, but here we are. I’m voting Brandon.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This headline is so confusing..

Do they mean Democrats would prefer another candidate or Repuplicans would?

Yes, I think democrats wanted another candidate (Bernie was running away with it till the mass drop out and endorsement of Biden, eg, ratfuck two, electric boogaloo), but I also think democrats are resigned to voting for Biden.

Like its fine, we didn't want him in the first place but this is obviously a strategic vote.

[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 6 points 9 months ago

Do they mean Democrats would prefer another candidate or Repuplicans would?

That's probably true for both parties. A large majority of voters didn't want a Biden/Trump rematch, but here we are.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

He could die any second, of natural causes to be clear. I like to think of it as voting for a corpse placeholder that will likely be replaced with Harris, who isn't great herself but isn't mostly dead like Biden or Trump.

[–] utopianfiat@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He's getting a lot of votes for someone we didn't want.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Again, who are you talking about?

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

This best part of a Biden win is finding out who will be the DNCs successor in the the next election. Sanders is out of the question but if we could get someone along those lines that'd be great.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The series of engagements illustrate the opportunities and challenges Biden faces as he enters a contest against an opponent he has openly labeled a threat to democracy, yet whom some polls show with a small nationwide lead.

They viewed Trump’s grievance-laden speech Tuesday evening – in which he complained about Nikki Haley’s decision to remain in the race, and insulted her choice of dress – as a perfect example of the split-screen they hope will be on display frequently over the coming months, as the former president vows to run a campaign of retribution.

It has now become routine for Biden’s public events to be interrupted by similar protests – including as he was accepting the UAW’s endorsement Wednesday – though the volume of demonstrators at the abortion speech was higher than previously seen.

Democratic jitters about Biden’s reelection prospects have been smoldering for months, leading to anxious conversations among party leaders and donors about his campaign’s strength and structure heading into the general election.

Jen O’Malley Dillon and Mike Donilon were long expected to play critical roles in Biden’s reelect effort no matter where they were sitting, and the moves were hardly surprising.

Consumer sentiment is improving, inflation is easing and wages are rising, all providing optimism inside the West Wing and campaign headquarters that Americans’ views of the economy could soon catch up to indicators that have long been trending positive.


The original article contains 1,461 words, the summary contains 231 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its not just the party that wanted someone else, its 70% of dem voters