this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
16 points (66.0% liked)

Furry

1839 readers
1 users here now

General community for furry stuff and memes!

Please follow pawb.social rules, with addition of the following:

  1. AI-generated content should be clearly marked in the title of the post, though it is generally discouraged unless it is in some way unique. If it becomes excessive still and drowns out artists or otherwise becomes an issue this may be further restricted.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
16
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by german@pawb.social to c/furry@pawb.social
 

i can't afford commissions, found it to be really cute so posted :(

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Caramel@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] german@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bing image creator lol, it's like a juiced up dall-e 2

[–] HundaRaketisto@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That might just be what it is. I decided to look up the differences, and apparently according to The Site That Shall Not Be Named "The Bing image creator is using the 2.exp model of dalle" or may even have something newer.

[–] german@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

There are a couple of annoying things about it:

  • The fact that it outputs super compressed JPEGs
  • The presence of a (non-removable) watermark.
    Both are easily fixable with some inpainting and upscaling. DALL-E 2 has an official API which provides no watermark, however, so it could be better.

    What isn't fixable is MSFT's self-contradictory terms of service stating that they don't claim ownership to the generations, but also stating right next to it that you can't use the outputs commercially. Who's going to enforce that if they don't claim ownership..? Anyway I just use it to generate art of my sonas, not selling it lol, but might be annoying if you for example want to make a cover art for a music platform