this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
55 points (87.7% liked)

politics

18852 readers
5242 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If I could have one wish for the new year, it would be for Britain’s criminal justice system to be reformed in a way that would ensure the arrest, prosecution and conviction of every single rapist in the country. I do not mean, of course, any man accused of rape, but every man who has actually committed rape.

One of the most prevalent and persuasive myths about rape and sexual assault is that a large number of allegations are false and men who have been publicly accused of rape but could not be convicted in a court of law are the victims of grave miscarriages of justice.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Despite such shockingly high figures, there is still a presumption that many women make false allegations about male violence – in particular, rape

And shame on the people who keep disseminating this myth.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the studies that show these numbers are brutal.

I’ve read them.

Most of the time their logic is “if the victim gives enough details, then it’s not false”

Or

“This cross examination of multiple studies shows that the studies all came to the same result” except that the studies all used the same methodology soo….. that doesn’t really prove anything.

I’m not saying they’re right or wrong, I’m saying that the studies themselves are brutally flawed.

I’m open to being wrong though, show me a study or any numbers that can conclusively prove what the actual stats are. Because to the best I can tell, there’s no good method to discover what percentage are true or false.

But maybe I’m wrong?

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My god, they're just giving out fedoras to anyone nowadays, huh?

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Hah, the personal insult.

No, I’ve just lived long enough to see through some of the narratives people push.

As I said, I’m open to the idea that I may be wrong, I can’t really know for sure, and I haven’t seen anything terribly convincing in either direction.

Have a nice day.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And I wish a billion dollars would materialize in my living room, but unfortunately we both live in the real world.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

A billion is too much, but a million pounds is quite a reality with premium bonds.