this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
136 points (90.5% liked)

AI Generated Images

7159 readers
297 users here now

Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.

No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.

This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.

Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.

No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.

AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.

To embed images type:

“![](put image url in here)”

Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.


Community Challenge Past Entries

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] papabobolious@feddit.nu 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If it was suited to the Scandinavian market it wouldn't be a truck. We don't understand why you want your stuff outside, we're van people.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Vans are frustratingly underrated, and overlooked mostly because it just doesn't look as cool. But to answer the question basically some stuff is better with an open cargo area, or at least one that isn't shared with the driver/passengers.

Dirt/gravel/mulch, hay bales, killed fish/game, chainsaws/fuel jugs, chemicals, disgustingly dirty work clothes etc.

How often the average truck owner uses it for those purposes is debatable but when needed it's nice to just toss stuff in and hose off the bed later. Trailers can do the same stuff mostly but manuvering is way better without one of course.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 7 points 10 months ago

As usual the AI is dyslexic and can't get the letters right.

[–] joenforcer@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Now I know what that parrot was pining for.

[–] bizarrocullen@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[–] Redward@yiffit.net 2 points 10 months ago

Nice a city pickup, for those slow rides to lidl

[–] OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So a regular cab maverick?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe if it was 3 times as long, wide and tall. This looks like the small trucks of lore. I wish we could attain them.

[–] OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The maverick is just tall. Its foot print is pretty small.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is wider, taller and about as long as a 3/4 ton truck from 30 years ago. We have been gaslit into thinking that it is a small truck. I think removing the standard cab as an option was the final move towards the embiggining of trucks.

[–] OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's straight up false. The 1993 F-250 had a width of 79 inches. The length of the 250 at it's shortest was 213.3 inches.

The Maverick is 72.4 inches wide, and 199.7 inches long. It's tall, sure, but so is everything.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was using a 1986 c20. Also including the massive side mirrors (on both old and new). So with the mirrors (maverick is 83.5 with mirrors and the c20 is 79 with non trailer add on mirrors) it is taller, wider and almost as long. Like I said we have been gaslit to think it is small as it is small compared to every other truck being sold now. I would love to drive the size of new truck in this AI rendition.

[–] OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Oh yeah, it's nice to drive old small trucks. But my point was the maverick is smaller than you think.