this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
905 points (96.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5695 readers
1718 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 72 points 10 months ago

I ordered two large fries and all I got was a HUNDRED FUCKIN LITTLE ONES

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I shouldn't eat ANY French fries for my health. Fortunately, my health isn't a consideration when I'm having fries. Sounds like they found a good way to use grant money for lunches, though!

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok, you've convinced me that I need a shitload of fries. Off to the airfryer I go!

[–] clb92@feddit.dk 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I read it as hairdryer at first

Ok, you’ve convinced me that I need a shitload of fries. Off to the hairdryer I go!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Serving sizes are always a fucking joke.

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Nutritional stats per 100g is the only way

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Reminder: Pam Cooking Spray is zero calorie, zero fat, and zero carb

Because there are 746 Servings in a single can of Pam. A serving size of 1/4 a second - which is small enough I'm not sure most people could do it. Just enough to round down from a tiny fraction to zero.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not a great example. Cooking spray is for making a pan or cover non-stick. You ingest very little of it.

[–] panda_paddle@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You've obviously not spent enough time around gym bros. I have on multiple occasions overheard conversations about using it as a butter substitute because, "...it has no calories. "

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Tell them it is just expensive canola oil and have them switch, knowing that canola has realistic serving sizes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So what would be the serving size of a baked potato? Because a single potato can make more than 6 fries and usually when you have a baked potato, it's the whole potato.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Baked potatoes aren’t cooked in grease which adds a bit of calories

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Right, you have to add the butter, cheese, and sour cream afterwards

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe a baked potato is a special case because you arent using oil to cook it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vahtos@programming.dev 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can't believe they didn't include the unit. Are we talking 6 small, medium, or large fries? There's variation on where you get them from too. That could be so many fries!

/s

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

6 Waffle Fries.

[–] SonicBlue03@sh.itjust.works 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I eat 6 fries at a time. There are probably ten "servings" in a medium fries at McDonald's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

I've never had a problem with having more than 1 serving at a time before and I'm not about to stop now

[–] omega_x3@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

6 shoestring fries? 6 steak fries? 6 potato wedges?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

6 loaded potato skins, with tons of cheese and bacon!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

This is the information we need. Steak fries and wedges can be on the big side, amounting to something like half a typical russet potato: more than enough starch for a meal.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I see the Scottish Tory Six Chip Twat has got a new sideline as a Harvard professor.

Probably for the best because he'll be out of work by the end of the year.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Scottish Tory Six Chip Twat

Hey, I can also string together words in a way that's never been done before in the entire history of mankind, here goes... (cracks knuckles)...

Cowabunga Kerfuffle Rocketry Wiener Salad

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

...You're not gonna believe what I had for dinner last night

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

I've given up eating at fast food places .... it doesn't make any sense when you think about it over a lifetime.

You're buying unhealthy food that degrades your health and the food is being prepared and handled by people being paid as little as possible while these same workers more often than not don't like their job. The average person looks down on the fast food worker job and we make fun of them .... but we all think nothing of expecting them to make our food. Even the food itself is not food as it's scientifically engineered to be as addictive as possible, not make you immediately sick and produced with as cheap an edible food product as possible ... many of McDonald's items are known to use a cellulose food filler made from wood pulp ... basically sawdust.

And we pay a premium for it.

The more I thought of it, the more reasons I had to not buy this crap let alone eat it.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but I'm hungry and want burgey now!

[–] 11181514@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ok we're talking about fries. Deep fried potatoes. Places like in n out literally make them in front of you. You aren't going to do it any cheaper or healthier at home.

The "average" person doesn't "look down" on fast food workers and who tf is this "we" making fun of them?

And what exactly is the problem with cellulose? It's an extremely abundant plant based protein. It makes food have a better texture and doesn't effect the taste. Do you not eat salad because it has cellulose in the lettuce leafs?

[–] wunami@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's an extremely abundant plant based protein.

Cellulose is a polysaccharide. Not a protein.

[–] 11181514@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Oh.. ok my bad. Thanks for the correction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Its used because its cheap and people barely have time or energy to take care of themselves in the daily grind that is modern life thanks to capitalist exploitation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

but borgir tasty

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

There's no such thing as cheap food.

Heard that in a TED talk and they're words to live by.

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I'm gonna be honest, the more wood pulp they can put in there, the better. I'd eat fast food more often if it was worse for me but had less calories overall. We are always making tradeoffs when making any food decision and the calculus I'm using when I'm at a fast food place is hedonist.

If I wanted something nutritious, I wouldn't be ordering multiple crunchwrap supremes. Give me an option to make it Al Serrín instead of Al Fresca, and I would choose that as long as the flavor is there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Yeah, 6 per bite is really optimal. One at a time can be fun, but 6 is much more satisfying!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Just go for the really chunky Belgium "pommes frittes" (something which the Dutch call "patate~~s~~") to follow the letter of the rule but not quite the spirit of it.

Also, they're amazing!

Edit: turns out the Dutch call them "patate" (also friet and frieten) which I incorrectly pluralized in the French way because I also speak French so it just sounded wrong to me in the singular form and I assumed I recalled it wrong. Thanks to all that corrected me and explained it.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

(something which the Dutch call “patates”)

we do not

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brakenium@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It's patat or friet in Dutch. I think it depends on region mostly?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Fine. I'll have 10 servings then.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I know how disastrously unhealthy french fries are, I also know how delicious and addictive they are. So I've learned to just not eat any at all. Because it's impossible to eat just one. or six.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I'll take 40 servings of fries in one plate please.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago (8 children)

If it were up to scientists we’d all eat leafy greens and water. Because that’s healthiest.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't think such a diet would actually be considered very healthy to be honest, wouldn't one at least need a protein source?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah you gotta add some beans and rice with occasional nuts

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

While it's obvious you are exagerating, no scientist would say that unless it's a "scientist". The right balance of nutrients as an average over time is the correct way.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Actual scientists at NASA learned that eating the same gruel every day affected mental health, so folks on the ISS have a pretty varied diet. Even though todays coffee is yesterdays coffee.

Which I think is a good enough excuse to eat more than six fries as a serving.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Don't let any Belgian see this!

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Image Transcription: Twitter Posts


CBS46, @cbs46

You should only eat 6 fries per serving, Harvard professor says. bit.ly/2FVZq4M

[A stock image of french fries]

O Coley Night, @ColeyMick

Shut the fuck up, nerd

load more comments
view more: next ›