this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
304 points (97.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9725 readers
767 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....And then they mostly couldn't be bothered to actually get college degrees despite how cheap they were, yet still ended up with good careers capable of supporting entire households with only one person working anyway.

Despite his cynicism, even Bernie manages to understate the problem here!

[–] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Just throwing out there, this was one generation out of however many to the dawn of time that was able to do this. And they did it on the backs of the hundreds of thousands of people that fought, starved and died to get unions established. For the vast majority of history, if you could work you worked man, woman & child because if you didn't your family starved. Then people fought for generations to get unions established and they finally did it and one single generation got the advantages of it before the next generation decided they didn't need no stinking unions as they were working white collar jobs and here we are. We're not standing together so we're falling together.

[–] Smoothie_Criminal@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Hillary stole Bernie's nomination and robbed Americans of his presidency

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kokoapadoa@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because of America's dogshit election system, she won the popular vote.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd give anything to go back in time and see how that election goes differently with an Approval Vote.

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, a candidate like Trump was not an "if" but a "when".

Even if the Dems had won that election, history has shown they they would not have made any real.changes. They would have done nothing to try and prevent something like the Trump Presidency from happening. They wouldnt have tried to fix the rigged gerrymandered districts, they wouldn't have pushed for voting reform, they wouldn't have tried to call put the insane rhetoric being put out by right wing propaganda machines, and they wouldn't have instilled better checks and balances on the presidency that relied on more than the assumtions of common decency, respect, and tradition.

Nah, they would have rested on their laurels for electing the first female president, and be caught with their pants down when the GOP successfully harnessed the resentment of angry white men for being "under the rule" of a black muslim socialist for eight years, and a satanic pedophile child eating woman for 4.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Even if the Dems had won that election, history has shown they they would not have made any real.changes.

THREE Supreme Court justices would have been very different today. Thats going two have repercussions for the next 3 generations.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Hillary didn't rob him of it; the Democratic Party robbed him of it.

[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It was the Democratic establishment and the corporate media that stole it. The biggest thing they fear is a candidate that puts the American people over corporate interests.

[–] CallMeDuracell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wanted to believe this during the 2016 party primary like I needed to breathe. Hell, I STILL want to believe it. But the reality is that the American people robbed us of his presidency.

2016 was one of the first elections where Gen X, Gen Z, and Millennials collectively outvoted the boomers and the silent generation, by the slimmest of margins. It goes without saying how much the older generation drinks from of the neo-liberalism kool-aid. A self-professing socialist was always going to be a hard sell.

As far as the 2016 Democratic primary goes, Bernie got 1820 pledged (elected) and 45 unpledged (super/unelected) delegates. To win by one delegate, he would have needed to get 518 additional super delegates to overcome Hillary's pledged delegate lead over him. A win from him would have caused an outrage, since the unelected delegates would have overridden the elected (read: will) of the Democratic primary voters.

The most important thing American voters can do is to continue to demonstrably show how neo-liberal socio-economic politics is marching us to generational ruin to every voter you know, and then vote appropriately in every local, state, and federal election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Image Transcription: Twitter Post


Bernie Sanders, @BernieSanders

The Boomer generation needed just 306 hours of minimum wage work to pay for four years of public college. Millennials need 4,459.

The economy today is rigged against working people and young people. This is what we are going to change.


^I'm a human volunteer transcribing posts in a format compatible with screen readers, for blind and visually impaired users!^

[–] QRay@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we keep the timestamp in when cropping a post from another website?

[–] NOPper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

7:29 AM · Apr 24, 2019 for the record.

[–] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bernie sanders screaming into the wind yet again.

Bernie i love ya but nobody is gonna do the things you say.

They are way too reasonable.

[–] ItchySunItchyKnee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Isn’t that kind of defeatist?

I don’t really have a horse in this race since I am not from the US.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's more cynicism than defeatism. People from the United States have pushed for these kinds of common sense reforms for our entire lives and we still have nothing to show for it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Fyi A full time job is 2080 hrs a year (40hrs/wk x 52 weeks).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ThesePaycheckAvenging@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's always good to focus on buying power. I bet you would get similarly ridiculous numbers when valuing food or housing in some normalized work hours (doesn't have to be minimum wage, could be median income too).

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the only solution to this problem is subsidies.

Subsidies knowledge works well around the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RufusFirefly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Federal Reserve has more power to control inflation than the president ever did. Presidents can't control supply and demand, nor can they control how much Amazon, Uber or Walmart pay their workers. Why do so many people believe that the US president is able to raise or lower prices of commodities, homes or college on a whim?

[–] zombuey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The president appoints multiple people on the board of the fed. But that's about it. More to your point neither the fed or the president has any control left on the main causes of inflation. Principal of which is corporate greed. Every major market in the US is an unnatural monopoly due to the fact we stopped busting monopoly's. Corporate greed would not be an inflationary cause but since there is so little competition in markets they can conspire without communication. Neither the president or the fed have any levers in which to do anything about this realistically since half our legislation is wholly owned by those same companies that hold control over these markets.

Companies very literally trained judges through continued learning requirements to not fight monopolies. The only bar for a merger today is a single question "Will prices go down" companies lie saying "yes" then it gets approved and there is no recourse or follow up.

They further make fallacious claims like "Monopolies don't exist without government!" Which is a total farce perpetuated by the same groups. It's meant to have people vote against their interests. Monopolies are an inevitable consequence of capitalism. It must divide at a certain point or stagnate.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm confused... Did someone say the president controls this stuff? I don't see that in the original post.

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] electriccars@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

6 class days away from finishing my Associates Degree at community college. 😁

Halfway to Bachelor's.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›