this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
106 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Federal officials have warned that public servants at all levels of government have faced a huge surge in threats in recent years.

wanna guess which group of humans is producing all these threats against their own government? hint: it aint antifa

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 17 points 10 months ago

Almost as if letting key instigators go on instigating without consequences is a bad tactic...

Call me crazy, but I don't think the finger waggling and pleas to "do the right thing" are convincing those people.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Humans, you say? Well now I'm stumped.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It seems like it has to do with removing Trump from the ballot in case anybody was wondering.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That will surely get them to change their mind. Do people just not have self-preservation anymore? They likelihood that the person making these threats will be found is pretty high, I'm sure. So this person is risking their freedom. They so love for Trump?

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

People in cults don't act rational. In fact, cults frequently rely and require their members to act and think irrationally.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Threats of acts of terrorism are much cheaper than acts of terrorism. Both cause terror.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Look how easy it is to disrupt state governments. Maybe we should do something about it?

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Clearly all this violence is an antifa false flag op /s

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Department spokesperson Bailey Martin said the agency was working with state and federal officials in investigating the threats.

Law enforcement officials in Florida, Massachusetts and Maine didn’t immediately respond to questions.

The agency added that it would "continue to work with our law enforcement partners to gather, share, and act upon threat information as it comes to our attention."

Federal officials have warned that public servants at all levels of government have faced a huge surge in threats in recent years.

In September, Attorney General Merrick Garland testified that government workers had seen an “astounding” number of such threats.

In addition, several government officials have faced, in just the last month, an uptick in “swattings” — when someone makes a false report of a crime in progress to draw police to a certain location.


The original article contains 472 words, the summary contains 134 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!