Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11230 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate.

Cross-posting

!everything_git@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!docker@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!portainer@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!fediverse@lemmy.ml is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
!selfhosted@lemmy.ml is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Zoe8338@lemmy.ml

dogmuffins@lemmy.ml

testman@lemmy.ml

What's the better choice, hosting images locally or using imgur to host your images for you? (l.lucitt.com)

submitted 1 year ago by FVVS@l.lucitt.com to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://l.lucitt.com/post/6770

I believe there are pros and cons for both. Imgur is great because you truly don't have to think about disk space or bandwidth. Imgur is not great because they can delete your posts at any time without warning and leave holes on the interenet, especially if we're talking 5, 10 , 20 years from now.

Should I invest in a beefy server to store all of my photo needs without storage anixety? Or should I just rely on a larger company to handle it for me? I think I'm already answering my own question by writing this post out, but I'd love to hear from the self hosting community.

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Osayidan@social.vmdk.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both. Use imgur or whatever service you like to actually share so you don't have to worry about bandwidth and hosting. Just also keep a local copy of everything, doesn't need to be a beefy server. Just don't let a 3rd party online service be the only copy.

[–] FVVS@l.lucitt.com 2 points 1 year ago

Ooh, I like this answer. If they pull it, you still have it. Can always post again.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't it that Imgur will allow only registered and verified accounts to post in the future?

If the traffic plan allows it: self-hosting images is the way.

[–] FVVS@l.lucitt.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I guess when it comes down to it, if you want 100% control you have to pay for it yourself.

[–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 3 points 1 year ago

I do both, at least in the context of linking say screenshots to others.

If I'm linking a very "casual" or non important screenshot then I'll just toss it up on my server and link that copy.

If it were somewhat important, then I'll upload it to my server and imgur and link the imgur copy, just in case my server goes down - doesn't stop imgur from deleting it either but if I get hit by a train and am made unavailable then imgur is probably the best bet.

If it is critically important then I try to avoid screenshots / pictures all together and just describe it in text because that has the best chance of persisting. And if the text disappears, then at that point the image is probably not as useful either.

load more comments