this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
134 points (96.5% liked)

Linux

48307 readers
1073 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m curious about what you think on how it will affect the Linux community and distros (especially RHEL based distros like Fedora or Rocky).

(page 3) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] archy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess "torrenting a Linux distro" will have a completely new meaning 😁

[–] humdrumgentleman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As a strictly desktop/personal Linux user, could someone enlighten me: What advantage (if any) does RHEL have over Ubuntu Pro at this point?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] doophy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interestingly, I've been trying to push my HPC customers towards SLES and Ubuntu LTS. SLES has better extended support for minor releases (that doesn't cost an arm and a leg), and Ubuntu's LTS... for obvious reasons.

[–] manifex@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

How has Cannonical support been recently? I used Ubuntu Server for a while, but never really needed to use my support contract, but my recollection is that it was fairly light.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

They can't go closed source. They aren't going closed source. It's not allowed under the GPL, so not sure what you mean by this.

[–] natsume_shokogami@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

It seems like what I've read from GPLv2 and GPLv3 as well as RH's EULAs, contrary to some people here, Red Hat technically didn't violate the GPL, but they are already not following the spirits of GPL and free software/open source (People expect free/open source software as in they can easily find the source publicly accessible in GitHub, GitLab, CodeBerg, or whatever Git, Subversion,... repos of your company or organization). And I think they don't believe in free marketing either, many other companies are aware that people are pirating their softwares, or compiling the software themselves (if it's open source) and give them as if it's from them for free; especially when you're dominating a market segment, it can make people exposed and relying on your softwares, so that anyone will mandate to use your softwares because it's "industry standards".

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›