this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023

216 points (97.8% liked)

Uplifting News

11294 readers

413 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

WandererLagomorph770@lemmy.world

wolfeh@lemmy.world

216

5 wolves released in Colorado as part of reintroduction plan (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Somewhere on a remote mountainside in Colorado’s Rockies, a latch flipped on a crate and a wolf bounded out, heading toward the tree line. Then it stopped short.

For a moment, the young female looked back at its audience of roughly 45 people who stared on in reverential silence. Then she disappeared into the forest.

She was one of five gray wolves wildlife officials released in a remote part of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains on Monday to kick off a voter-approved reintroduction program that was embraced in the state’s mostly Democratic urban corridor but staunchly opposed in conservative rural areas where ranchers worry about attacks on livestock.

...

It marked the start of the most ambitious wolf reintroduction effort in the U.S. in almost three decades and a sharp departure from aggressive efforts by Republican-led states to cull wolf packs. A judge on Friday night had denied a request from the state’s cattle industry for a temporary delay to the release.

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 38 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I can't help but laugh because apparently Democrats have voted to release large predators into the parts of the state where Republicans live.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's risks to choosing to live away from other humans. North America is rampant with large predators: wolves, bears and lions. Humans banned together millennia ago for such protection. If you wish to live a dozen miles from more than 2 other people, that's a risk you take.

Reintroducing wolves is fixing the mistake we made in killing them all; which is causing more problems than it solved.

[+] Frozengyro@lemmy.world -18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think we killed them all? So people didn't have to take that risk?

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No that’s not really the cause. This is a known thing and reintroduction is common. For example:

https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/nature/wolf-restoration.htm

TLDR: Cause: “ In the 1800s, westward expansion brought settlers and their livestock into direct contact with native predator and prey species. Much of the wolves’ prey base was destroyed as agriculture flourished. With the prey base removed, wolves began to prey on domestic stock, which resulted in humans eliminating wolves”

Effect of reintroduction: “Preliminary data from studies indicate that wolf recovery will likely lead to greater biodiversity throughout the GYE. Wolves have preyed primarily on elk, and these carcasses have provided food to a wide variety of other animals, especially scavenging species. Wolves are increasingly preying on bison, especially in late winter. However, most bison biomass consumed by wolves is through scavenging bison dying from other natural causes. Grizzly bears have usurped wolf kills almost at will, contrary to predictions and observations from other areas where the two species occur. Wolf kills, then, provide an important resource for bears in low-food years. Aggression toward coyotes initially decreased the number of coyotes inside wolf territories, which may have benefited other smaller predators, rodents, and birds of prey.”

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Thanks for sharing this. It’s really interesting!

[–] tux@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My problem with this study has always been that it takes place in Yellowstone. A huge area that is super controlled and significantly different from the rest of the country.

I think blindly believing we'll see the same results everywhere we throw wolves is wishful thinking.

Guess we'll see how it plays out. As a hunter I'm not thrilled to have more competition for elk and deer, but it's always been (and should be) predators get first dibs on wildlife. What I want is to see the reintroduction and revitalization of the buffalo. You know how cool it'd be to see giant herds of bison roaming all over the wild?

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s weird to think that ecologists, biologists, and other scientists who have studied this issue historically as well as other reintroduction efforts are “blindly” believing anything…

Meanwhile elsewhere… https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/people-predators/public-perspectives-on-wolves-and-wolf-reintroduction-8-004/

“ Studies suggest that attitudes towards wolf reintroduction are influenced by individuals’ beliefs about the right for wolves to exist as well as their emotional responses to wolves.”

[–] tux@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Great read! Very interesting.

I still think it was silly to have reintroduction of wolves up to a popular vote instead of leaving it up to the professionals. But it happened, I'm curious to see how far their range goes, the ones in WA go all over.

[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Edit: I was wrong about ranchers getting a lot of subsidies, it’s the crop farmers that receive a disproportionate amount of subsidies.

https://thecowdocs.wordpress.com/2017/02/28/do-cattle-ranchers-and-farmers-get-government-subsidies/

Be prepared to see a lot of trash people claiming wolves killed their livestock because there is a government subsidy fund for livestock killed by wolves but not other predators like bears, cougars, coyotes etc. instated when wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone

From this book: The Killing of Wolf number Ten

[–] Neato@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why is there a subsidy for that? Ranchers should be able to protect their herds without wantonly murdering wolves. Fuck, get some drones with pepper spray or stun guns. The future is now cowboys!

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The future is now cowboys!

But I don't WANT the future to be cowboys now! sulks

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I take it you have no idea what ranching is like.

[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Been to multiple actually. Commercial and private.