this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

8259 readers
5 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quereller@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now prepare for a heart attack - also paternity leave. (It is usually less however)

[–] crib@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Let Dads be Dads!

[–] lz0@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

This is old and/or incorrect. Sweden should really be included, since we have 480 (~70 weeks) days of paid leave for one child. Finland and Denmark has 50 weeks, and Norway has 59.

In a household with two parents you get 240 days each, and if you're a single household you get all 480 days.

[–] lividhen@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Finland up here being quirky af

Also paternity, I got 2 weeks in the UK which is minimum, but I have friends in the UK who got as much as their partner if they want to take it!

[–] Spitfire@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

It should absolutely be guaranteed in the US, too.

But good luck getting any law to pass that gives it. It'll turn into rage over increased taxes to cover it, and it'll fall apart. (Meanwhile, more tax cuts for rich folks)

[–] soundasleep@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

26 weeks paid + 26 weeks unpaid here in New Zealand. link

[–] Nommer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And politicians wonder why they have to try and force people to have kids. Nobody can fucking afford them, let alone daycare or even get time off to take care of them themselves.

[–] slifer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk why companies don't implement Long paternity leaves followed by an optional switch to a WFH role where they can spend more time with their family. It'd boost morale and increase quality of work ...

[–] crib@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agree! Still I hear a lot of indirect complaints from managers in my company that we are too little at the office. They claim all kinds of made up resons, "bad for morale", "losing the connection to the company", "harder to onboard new people".
Still, during the pandemic they were pushing the message that productivity INCREASED.

Really, I dont get it. At my work we are professionals and micromanage us where we sit to do our work is just annoying and if anything will decrease "morale" and "connection to the company". And if anyone needs hands-on face-2-face then we will schedule a day in the office. Im sure the teams will figure these things out themselves and do not need someone telling them which room to sit while doing it.

load more comments
view more: next ›