this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
74 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45589 readers
1472 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Please tell me the company that developed these isn't run by someone named Ted Faro...

[–] PeefJerky@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there is Ted Faro, we need our Elizabeth Sobek.

I just completed Zero Dawn and fuck it’s a good game! Can’t wait for the PC port of Forbidden West!

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Obligatory "fuck Ted Faro"

Also someone should start a Horizon community, I've already started up enough to keep my hands full trying to pump them into life

[–] PeefJerky@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

+1

Horizon really has a good lore. Can’t wait to get my hands on Forbidden West on PC!

[–] NiCapp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Do you want Project: Zero Dawn? Cause this is how we get Project: Zero Dawn!

[–] randomaccess2112@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have no clue, but now I want to know

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, it's not true.

The EATR was programmed to consume certain types of vegetation as biomass to convert into fuel, and only those types of vegetation. EATR could also use other fuels such as gasoline, kerosene, cooking oil, or solar energy.

Cyclone Power Technologies stated that animal or human biomass was not intended to be used in the waste heat combustion engine of the robot,[4] and that sensors would be able to distinguish foraged materials,[2] although the project overview from RTI listed other sources including chicken fat.[5]

Also, this is from 2009.

[–] TRSea@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

UNfortunately?! ... But seriously, thanks for the fact check, I was wondering.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

UNfortunately?!

Aside from the US military (or military scavenging in general), if I could sacrifice myself to power a robot (better than lawn clippings could) I might. I don't think it'd be unlikely that there's a scenario where said robots would be doing something right (some point/goal) if they're autonomous (in the governmental sense).

I mean I'd rather have my brain hooked up to something, but I guess that doesn't help with wattage requirement.

[–] TRSea@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha, that is hilarious. But I think there is enough other biomass on this planet that you shouldnt feel like you have to sacrifice yourself to feed even the good robots

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, never said it was a healthy thought. But it's like an equivalent exchange type thing, less like putting a log on a fire and more like a few tanks of energy-dense fuel (not that it actually could work like that).

[–] lvl100magikarp@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

And I assume the image is an unrelated demonstrating a rescue operation

[–] CyanPurple@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Horizon Zero Dawn is not a manual people

[–] namhi@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Nanachi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

HELL IS FULL

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›