this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
191 points (88.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] S_204@lemm.ee -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A liberal politician with a spine?

The 'progressive democrats' are going to lose their minds. Their in group out group demanding bs is rivaling that of the Republicans. So much for freedom of thinking or ideas.

I'm curious to see how this guy rolls over the next few years but this is nice to see.

ETA. Wanting to curtail people entering the country without following the process and getting rid of someone who is legitimately accused of being a crook doesn't seem like they should be questionable. Supporting one of Americas closest Ally's is questionable these days though. That's fair game.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -4 points 11 months ago

f parties didnt exist this would be a conservative, just like the sitting president.

this person here is really just a republican too afraid to call himself that, like a huge chunk of the 'democratic' party.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

Wildcard, bitches!

[–] SteveCC@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

Our elected representatives need to be able to use their brains and their consciences and represent us over their political parties. Good for him standing up. If you aren't aware -represent us is working on making it so this can happen more often.

https://represent.us/

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why does everyone act like this guy is some every man Savior? He's a silver spoon baby with a trust fund who can't even be bothered to dress like a professional adult. I've never liked the guy, always had a phony vibe to him

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He was a lib who actually put effort into a campaign and built up a coalition of voters around essentially the progressivish platform that Biden had promised as his compromise with Sanders.

For many Fetterman represented an actual movement of the Democratic party away from the neoliberal establishment status quo. His campaign largely felt like it proved that being such a break from the DNC norm.

So he has been a real bummer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›