It kind of sad, they have to recognise how close to an election we are before they grow a spine.
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
10 points (91.7% liked)
UK Politics
3089 readers
48 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The One Nation group of centrist Tories is considering tabling amendments to Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda bill to protect the controversial legislation against breaches of international law.
Conservative MPs on the party’s moderate wing are concerned the government could cave in to demands from the right to harden the bill to avoid them voting it down in the new year.
Former justice secretary Robert Buckland, a member of the One Nation group, is considering tabling an amendment of his own to make the bill legally more safe so it is compatible with the European convention on human rights, the Guardian can reveal.
Other centrist Tory MPs are looking at ways of holding the government to its commitment to remain within international law and prevent Sunak from giving significant concessions to the right.
After 29 Tory MPs abstained on the bill on Tuesday, the vast majority from the right of the party, a Common Sense Group source said there was scope to gather the requisite number of votes to oppose the legislation in the new year.
One senior rightwing MP who met Sunak before the vote said he had suggested tweaking clause 4 of the bill, which allows migrants to continue lodging individual claims, to add further curbs.
The original article contains 720 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
With their numbers the amendment might succeed, in which case the lunatics on the right will vote it down. And if the One Nation amendment fails, then they'll vote it down themselves. You love to see it.
Interesting tactical decision for Labour and the other opposition parties. Vote in favour of the amendment, then against the bill whether or not the amendment passes? Or vote against the amendment and also against the bill? I'm not sure which is most likely to make the bill fail because it depends on the numbers of Tory rebels on different sides of the party, how many of them are willing to actually risk defeating their own government, and whether they then abstain or vote against.