this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Tankiejerk

623 readers
1 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist perspective.

A tankie is someone who defends/supports authoritarian or even totalitarian regimes who call themselves "socialist". The term originated from people supporting the 1956 invasion of Hungary by the Soviet Union. Nowadays they are just terminally online, denying genocides, and falling for totalitarian propaganda and calling such regimes "true democracies". remember to censor usernames when necessary.

Please be sure to obscure usernames on posts to prevent doxxing.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love that when the issue of Ukrainian working class being murdered and exploited under a Russian kleptocracy comes up, the only thing they have is "But NATO bad!!!!"

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

All workers are equal but some workers are more equal than others /s

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sincerely, thank you. Fuck these fascist edgelords.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not even communist — rather a Georgist myself — but it's so fun to portray THEM as the conservative reactionaries and paid shills. They literally don't even know how to properly respond. The best part is everything I said is 100% true: tankies ARE in fact errand boys for the imperial elites. Or at the very least useful idiots.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The best part is everything I said is 100% true: tankies ARE in fact errand boys for the imperial elites.

It's so unreal for me, that they'd champion Russia and China of all places. I remember reading a comment from one tankie defending Xi removing his own term limit. "Clearly people like him, he has overwhelming poll numbers. Depriving them of the chance to continue to vote for him would be undemocratic"

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Depriving them of the chance to continue to vote for him would be undemocratic

Oh man, the irony. Do they not remember that China doesn't even pretend to have national popular elections? The people can't vote for Xi even if they actually wanted to!

[–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Huh. Just like Putin's "nullification"

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That's because they are reactionary scum, and just don't like admitting it.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seems reasonable to me. It’s strange to me how these people hate US liberals, never say a word about US conservatives, and love Russia and China, despite none of those things being in line with their professed beliefs.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't be pro worker and pro China, the literal sweatshop nation.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tankies go out of their way to defend an absolute hereditary monarchy just because the Kim Dynasty says they are communist, defending China is nothing in comparison. They are the same kind of idiots as the ones that fell for the "Sozialistische Arbeiterpartei" (socialist workers party) part of the NSAPD's (aka Nazi party) name.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

North Korea isn't a monarchy. It's a necrocracy. Officially the first Kim is still leader, despite being dead.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a theocracy with extra steps

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

It has layers, like onions, and green ogres.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re not talking about liberals in the way the word is used in contemporary American politics, they’re using the classical definition of liberal which fits most mainstream Americans be them democrats or republicans.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Right, I understand that distinction, but their philosophy doesn't make sense or hold consistence even in that context. The highest scorn is reserved for the most socialist American politicians, and American conservatives are pretty much 100% in line with the politics of Russia, other than gun control. Also, it makes no sense to revere China and Russia due to their governments being communist 60 years ago, because they are not now. Most of the discussion seems to be about foreign policy with little regard given to workers' rights or economics.