this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023

325 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19223 readers

2530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

outrageousmatter@lemmy.world

aidan@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

325

Taxpayer-Subsidized Seminars Train Cops To Violate the Constitution (reason.com)

submitted 1 year ago by HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ACAB.

I don't care if "not all cops, tho." They know about this shit, and they don't do anything about it. They're supposed to (in theory) prevent illegality, and yet this stuff gets a pass.

It's no wonder Fundigelicals are bosom buddies, because they do the same thing with religion.

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They always say “it’s just a few bad apples” and conveniently forget the point of the analogy is that the bad apples spoil the whole bunch. So until the little piggies remove ALL of the bad apples, ACAB is 100% correct.

[+] phoenixz@lemmy.ca -6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah I don't think it's that easy. Saying "all in this group are evil" is the same argument used to gas Jews in WWII, it's a really dumb and short sighted argument.

Yes, there is a LOT of shit going on and a lot of police officers are bad, but that doesn't mean they all are and just because they're not doing enough against this, doesn't mean they don't care or don't try or even can try...

With situations like these "it's not that simple" is a much better statement than acab, which as much fun as it may be to say, is just dumb and short sighted

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saying "all in this group are evil" is the same argument used to gas Jews in WWII

Comparing German Jews in WWII to present day American law enforcement is an insult and you should be ashamed of yourself.

just because they're not doing enough against this, doesn't mean they don't care or don't try or even can try...

They're not just "not doing enough", they're actively rooting out good cops from the force and punishing them for being good! While the bad cops continue being bad, all under the protection of their union! The system is corrupt from the top down, and its members fight to keep it that way!

With situations like these "it's not that simple" is a much better statement than acab, which as much fun as it may be to say, is just dumb and short sighted

What's dumb and short-sighted is downplaying the danger the American policing system poses with the same bullshit "they're not all bad" argument we've all heard for years. Answer me this: if they're not all bad, why do they keep getting worse?

[–] phx@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they're actively rooting out good cops from the force and punishing them for being good

Which is actually one reason I have the ACAB acronym. There are good cops, and they get shit from both ends either for not toeing the blue-line or just for being cops.

If somebody actually does get shot, the ACAB crew is out in full force while often ignoring the lengthy record of crime and violence of the involved - or even camera evidence - while stating it was obviously just a cop looking for somebody to shoot.

Fuckers are creating a self-fulfilling prophecy where nobody in their right mind would want to be a cop

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Works for me. They enjoy far too much indemnity. It's long past time they had to answer to the law they supposedly uphold.

But you missed the point. There are good cops. The problem is, they see the bad cops and choose their job over blowing the whistle. And given their line of work, that makes them spineless and complicit.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But how do you know they choose to not blow the whistle? Seems quite a number of things are coming to light where things WERE escalated to superiors or even government. These end up under gag-order while "under investigation" - often for years - which means that they reporting officer could be fined/jailed themselves for leaking it, and includes stuff like sexual assaults within the police force itself.

It's a no-win situation for good cops, and calling them spineless and complicit without knowing the details of such just makes you an asshole.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

seems quite a number of things are coming to light where things WERE escalated to superiors or even government. These end up under gag-order while “under investigation” - often for years - which means that they reporting officer could be fined/jailed themselves for leaking it, and includes stuff like sexual assaults within the police force itself.

This is the all in ACAB, right here. This is the point we're trying to make, and you're making it for us. The point is that the system of policing ensures that bad cops are protected and elevated and good cops are either silenced (thus becoming bad cops) or forced out. The fact that "it's a no-win situation for good cops" is exactly what ACAB is saying.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Except that ALL means everyone, which would include the ones doing good by citizens, fighting against corrupt shit, and not quitting.

It's not "all cops", it's the fucking system that corrupt.

It's like making a discriminatory (racist/sexist/whatever) comment and then turning to a person who falls under that group and saying "but, uh, we don't count you in that", and plenty of people DO immediately turn shit on anyone just for being a cop.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s not “all cops”, it’s the fucking system that corrupt.

What is the system made of? Who are the primary drivers? Don't try to make this about racism, "cop" is not a race, it's a conscious choice made by a knowing adult. You just said yourself that good cops, when they exist, either get corrupted or forced out. What does that leave? Bastards.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I'm okay being an asshole.

[–] Fedop 4 points 1 year ago

Not trying to make a point or anything, but it only took one comment for you to bring up a Hitler reference. Isn't that like loosing the game or something? Means you only have a weak point?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was that easy for an ex cop to agree that acab in a different comment. They agreed to the point that they said they themselves weren’t even a good cop.

When the cops themselves are agreeing with acab… I mean, believe them.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

this one anonymous person on the Internet claiming to be a cop agreed with me!

Yeah, that isn't exactly an argument. Not all police officers (can we pleeeaaase stop calling them the "cool" sounding "cop"?) are bad, especially outside of the US, but even inside the US you have loads of good guys and gals wanting to make a difference and make the world a better place.

Acab is the exact same behavior as those bad apples. Don't be like the bastards...

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

didn't say they were all evil. said some of them are evil and the rest ignore it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

The first a in acab means all so there is that... Beyond that, I'm sure there are loads that don't care and ignite it but there are also loads that do care but it simply isn't that simple. You can't just go on a lone crusader's path, burn your career and future to make ymreal meaningful change. It's not that easy.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think there are two things that need to happen to get this bullshit under control...first of all defang the police union...you can't function as a union busting group and get the protection of a union that's hypocritical bullshit. No more gypsy cops moving from force to force without their sins following them.

Second, a citizen review board that is made up of anonymous citizens called to serve like jury duty. The review board gets to make disciplinary decisions on police misconduct and it's 100% binding. No more some are more equal than others, or their dumbass "civilian" mind set... they're civilians too.

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Union for me, not for thee.

[–] JoJoGAH@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

All the more reason we need to #stopcopcity

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Police exist to protect the interests of capital owners. Not your constitutional "rights".

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

read this, ask yourself "why would police be against body cameras?" and realize that it's because they think their job entails constantly and knowingly breaking the law.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

So? The Constitution ONLY matters if I'm using it to defend a School Shooter!

[–] Tertle950@lemmy.basedcount.com 1 points 1 year ago

i love the government so much :)))

Hoping at least ONE undue search warrant that results from this garners a big fat lawsuit

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 year ago

And this is different from how my taxes are spent why?