this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
140 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3477 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is not "news", in that we don't need an "ally" to confirm what we already know. Trump has bluntly said this many times himself: His second term is going to be all about consolidating power, installing authoritarianism, and revenge. He has openly said he is going to have people arrested, news networks shut down, etc.

Identifying his motives isn't the problem. Getting people to care is the problem. Worse, trying to overcome the "Yeah, we know, we want it that way" crowd that for some reason seems to be growing.

Take a look at his rallies. It's not even the usual MAGA signs any more. "Peace through strength." I mean, if that isn't directly taken straight out of 1984 or some authoritarian handbook somewhere, I don't know what is.

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

What's crazy is the media keeps promoting him for money, but if he wins he's coming for them first.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Would such blatantly anti-democratic decisions even be possible if he would become president again?

In my country there was only one time in 1957 when a single party held majority and even if it would happen again there are so many laws and instances to prevent such decisions from going through that it would be impossible.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The executive branch (what he would be head of) are about the only federal government guys in our country with guns, so it won't really matter what the law says, as his future attorney General has said repeatedly.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Let's face it. if American voters wind up supporting a candidacy that is putting messages like this out there, it is going to be because they WANT fascism. These folks aren't hiding anything.

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

I think they want fascism until they get it and become a target of the fascist government.

Stop voting for Republicans, they don't believe in our democracy.

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Did he not try to do the exact same thing the first time around?

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He didn't have Project 2025 guiding him then.

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

Trump and Republicans have learned a lot from the first try to destroy democracy in America.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Yes but our military and lot government people who work in the Whitehouse who aren't elected stop him.

Hence project 2025 that fires them all.

[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 8 points 11 months ago

Maybe the media shouldn't give him such a fucking giant platform to spout his garbage then?

The media following everything he says and writing a story about every time he steps foot outside maralago is what gave him his first presidency. They're doing the exact same thing the second time around.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


NEW YORK (AP) — A Donald Trump ally who worked in his Justice Department said Tuesday that if the former president is elected again, his administration will retaliate against people in the media “criminally or civilly.”

Kash Patel, who was also chief of staff in the Defense Department and held a role on the National Security Council, made the comment on Steve Bannon’s podcast.

Trump and his allies have repeatedly claimed the election was stolen, despite the fact that numerous federal and local officials, a long list of courts, top former campaign staffers and even his own attorney general have all said there is no evidence of the fraud he alleges.

In his interview with Bannon, Patel said: “We’re going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections.

In a post on his Truth Social network in September, Trump repeated both phrases and vowed to investigate NBC News and MSNBC for “Country Threatening Treason” and try to curb their access to the airwaves.

“I say up front, openly, and proudly, that when I WIN the Presidency of the United States, they and others of the LameStream Media will be thoroughly scrutinized for their knowingly dishonest and corrupt coverage of people, things, and events,” Trump said in the post.


The original article contains 607 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!