this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
70 points (97.3% liked)

World News

39046 readers
3646 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

South China Morning Post isn't an amazingly trustworthy source, but it seems that they're right in this instance. Though it's annoying that they refuse to fully capitalise "NASA".

However, the approval is by no means formal. There's no public statement from NASA or from NSPIRES, the division responsible for it, and it appears it's just an internal email/statement telling scientists to put a claim in before the applications close on 22 Dec. As of yet, NASA have merely signalled their intent to Congress and told scientists to submit applications, it could well be that (the Republican controlled) Congress blocks it.

Here's another source: https://www.space.com/china-moon-samples-change-5-nasa-researchers

[–] teft@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Republican controlled congress? They lead one chamber by a margin a 3 votes. Not really what I’d call control.

[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

When your objective is obstruction then that’s all you need.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

Though it's annoying that they refuse to fully capitalise "NASA".

Not nearly as annoying as people who randomly capitalize three-letter words like cis or app.

[–] filoria@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

The Chang'e-5 samples originate from regions of the moon not yet sampled by NASA and are expected to provide valuable new scientific insight on the geological history of the moon, which could provide new understanding of the Earth-moon system and potentially inform NASA's future lunar exploration plans. Applying for samples will ensure that United States researchers have the same research opportunities as scientists around the world