this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Moving to: m/AskMbin!

19 readers
1 users here now

### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**

founded 1 year ago
 

I wouldn't. Immortality sounds miserable to me.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 667@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are arguments which state that when you “transfer” consciousness, there is no continuity of consciousness, meaning we are at best making a copy and destroying the original. While your copy would wake up as though nothing happened, the original you gets destroyed in the process and never actually gets to enjoy the transference.

[–] agamemnonymous@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'd much rather be a Ship-of-Theseus cyborg, replacing malfunctioning bits one at a time.

[–] Cap@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would depend on what kind of robot I'm being transferred into...

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, is the immortality mandatory, or do I get to decide when it ends?

[–] speck@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

A volcano can fix these types of immortality

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

depends on the fine print.
it really depends on the fine print.