You could just have a dedicated backup user that is in all the groups of you docker volumes.
Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
This is a common strategy in enterprise, they're called Service Accounts.
Rather than let all services/apps run under one admin account (windows) or a single account with root (*Nix), an account is created for each service/app, with only the minimum necessary permissions. These accounts are also limited, sometimes they're local accounts on a given server (rather than a domain/directory account), usually with no login capability (so couldn't run in a user context).
This way you prevent a 3rd party service/app from having change access to other services/apps (in Windows services run as system by default, a terrible security hole). It also prevents a rogue admin from using such access to change other things (or if the service account credentials were stolen).
You didn't mention how big those volumes are and how frequently the data changes.
Assuming it's not that much data:
- use
tar
to archive each volume first, while using proper options to preserve permissions and whatever else is important for your usecase - use restic to backup those archives
- use a proper pruning strategy to not let your backups get too big:
- I'm not that familiar with
restic
, but maybe you can backup those archives separately and apply a more aggressive pruning strategy just for them - simply might be needed, cause deduplication (AFAIK) might not be that great with backing up archives
- but maybe if the volume data and the resulting archive doesn't change that often, deduplication would be sufficient even with a not so aggressive pruning strategy
- I'm not that familiar with
Restic uses smart Delta backups, creating a tar before the restic process would defeat the purpose. The permission issue is the same, as I need to have access to the Files either way.