this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3592 readers
216 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] MXYp3Lk66yKv@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ohhhh. It's at a former coal site.

I couldn't work out the reason behind adding a battery to a coal power station, when the coalies claim that coal was needed for when renewables+battery wouldn't work.

[โ€“] Mountaineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Engie, who own the Hazelwood site (with some partners) are on the hook to "rehabilitate" it when they are done burning coal.

And they are definitely done burning coal, because it's no longer cost effective to maintain the old equipment and it's definitely too risky to build new burners.

So here's what they plan for the site long term: https://www.hazelwoodrehabilitation.com.au/

And in the short term, they are still a power company, so why not plonk their new batteries there, the site they own and which already has big connections to the power networks.