this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2021
0 points (NaN% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5284 readers
19 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] vimino@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Oh my, that's nearly half. Thinking about it, it's as bad as WiFi. Blasting everywhere was never efficient.

[โ€“] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I'd say this is worse than Wi-Fi, since with Wi-Fi you only need to transmit a small amount of energy to get a signal through. Plus there's beam forming Wi-Fi access points now.

Wireless charging is basically a small version of Nikola Tesla's tower that he wanted to power cities wirelessly with. That never worked because it was horribly inefficient, so I'm not sure why people think this would be better.