this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
615 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
30 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DJDarren@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Personally, I'm not entirely sure where I stand on this, so it troubles me.

On the one hand, I understand the admins' need to bring trolling and bad faith content under control, and ultimately this instance is theirs to do with as they feel necessary. I'm a mod in a couple of the communities and have yet to see anything troubling, but that's not to say that we won't get inundated with fuckery from people who don't know how to behave.

However, this makes it very difficult to see Lemmy as a useful alternative to Reddit.

I'm subscribed to a number of communities from a range of instances, some of which have just been excised completely from my feed. ~~As~~ ~~I~~ ~~understand~~ ~~it,~~ ~~over~~ ~~on~~ ~~Mastodon,~~ ~~if~~ ~~the~~ ~~admin~~ ~~of~~ ~~the~~ ~~instance~~ ~~I~~ ~~use~~ ~~chose~~ ~~to~~ ~~defederate~~ ~~from~~ ~~a~~ ~~server~~ ~~where~~ ~~some~~ ~~of~~ ~~my~~ ~~follows~~ ~~are,~~ ~~I'll~~ ~~still~~ ~~see~~ ~~those~~ ~~follows,~~ ~~but~~ ~~general~~ ~~content~~ ~~from~~ ~~the~~ ~~instance~~ ~~won't~~ ~~make~~ ~~it~~ ~~through~~ ~~the~~ ~~net.~~ ~~And~~ ~~that's~~ ~~ok.~~

Yeah, I'm wrong on that. I confused instance limitation with defederation.

There doesn't appear to be such nuance here on Lemmy; it's all or nothing. And this could lead to Beehaw becoming a limited, silo'd forum.

But ultimately, this feels mostly like it's a problem for the admins of lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works to address in being more responsible instance runners, and Beehaw is the server that put up with their shit less than the others.

So when all's said and done, I support the admins' decision, but it's not without hesitation.

[–] reric88@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

I'm a new user so I my opinion shouldn't weigh as much as regulars, but here it is anyway.

I support this decision. Some people may jump to it being censorship which just is not the case. They have the freedom to go there if they want to. It's like keeping enablers out of alcoholics anonymous. The AA member can go get booze if they want to. But the enabler shouldn't be allowed inside. If they want in, they need to get in like the other members, not just waltz in through the door while on a kick.

I like this place. I currently feel like it's a great place, and the fact you guys make decisions like this reenforces that.

[–] Infinitybiscuit@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I really appreciate the integrity here to keep the content engaging and the trolls at bay. Full support here.

[–] mtset@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the transparency; I fully support this decision.

[–] aka_oscar@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Unfortunate situation, but I understand the lack of tools to deal with it left you guys no choice.

Do you happen to know how long this defederation is going to take? Or rather, are tools being developed as we speak or still being discussed? Im glad this is temporary yet if its gonna be like this for years itd prove to be very limiting and isolating.

I also understand its not easy to give the mod position to anyone who requests it, but id encourage you to look for the right people in a more vehement manner. It would be downright frustrating if this situation happens again due to a lack of manpower.

One last thing: The defederation being effective Inmediately was very detrimental to users who subscribed to comms from those instances. Its already shocking to lose access to a comm you were a part of, a heads up and a couple hours/a day would help many of us be at least aware of the situation and not be blindsighted by it. I understand the pressure to do it asap, but i still think it should be notified beforehand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dandylion@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Thank you for this in the short term. Not gonna lie, I was a little grossed out by all the furry / anime porn / gone wild stuff that was crossing my feed when I hit all. No matter how fast I blocked the communities, I couldn't get them all. I'm not a prude person at all but I also don't come here to surf random porn.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] anova@seafoam.space 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@alyaza Been a hot minute since I logged into beehaw but I love the team's decisiveness on this. I'm surprised more instances didn't take this route when dealing with mastodon.social

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Laconic@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the ideal way to interface with open registration communities would be to have a registration process where they can access beehaw from that server after they've filled out an application just as we did to be able to join here. I'm not a coder, but I think that wouldn't be too challenging a feature.

I'm not excited about losing access to a bunch of communities on the fediverse. I'm not excited about needing a 2nd account if I want to avoid this. I hope a resolution can be found to roll this back without causing the admins too much pain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] loopy@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I understand that was probably a really tough decision. Props for doing what you believe in.

I really like the environment you all have set up here and only really made a lemmy.world account so I could add a couple of communities. Would you consider adding other communities in the near future if they seem reasonable?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vortex@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This kind of sucks. But until we get something equivalent to Mastodon's limited and better moderation tools, this'll have to do. I don't envy the mods workload.

Hopefully in the future we'll be able to "re-federate".

[–] Kaldo@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm pretty new here so dunno how much it counts, but for what it's worth I think it's a good idea. I've recently seen quite a few users that have been posting from these instances and it seemed to me like they are just trying to instigate conflict or drama rather than build a community. The way they have write is aggressive and rude but not enough to break any specific rules, which must be hell to moderate. The mods here have been amazing so far so if this will help them, I'm all for it.

~~Besides, it shouldn't affect users too much - we can still manually go and subscribe to defederated instances and see that in the "subscribed" feed, right? This just means it's not discoverable through "All", and vice versa.~~

edit: I was wrong, it seems defederating completely stops content flow between instances, the things I've been seeing on subscribed page is old stuff from before the defederation. Still, a bit tricky but not insurmountable if it makes for a better sense of community in the end.

[–] myself33@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

i think you take a wrong decision : i appreciate beehaw, but whatever you will do, you can't control everything let people use 'block user' feature, that's the purpose of this feature, and focus only on what people report as 'bad user'. Defederate for a toxic instance as 'lemmygrad' is good, but defederate from lemmy.world makes no sense for me. i hope it's just a temporary decision

[–] roblarky@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Just chiming in to say that while I can understand some people's frustration, I support this.

The community here is great and I'd like it to stay that way.

In real life, I choose to associate with good people and avoid areas where the quality of people who can show is completely unpredictable or not my taste.

i prefer a chill bar with quiet outside seating and no live music. I go there specifically because I'm not looking for a biker bar experience.

I see it as a strength to the fediverse. It's no different than different forums back in the day. I do understand that my above statement would be akin to different communities, but I agree that even if someone's behavior is only "bad" in a community where that was acceptable, it does affect the community as a whole, knowing that they're lurking (in terms of feeling like this is a safe space).

Keep up the good work, and thank you for having to make these difficult decisions; I know it's not easy.

[–] thesanewriter@vlemmy.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I completely understand this decision, though I personally enjoy the freedom of being able to go to multiple instances. Hopefully, as the mod tools develop further and more limited forms of defederation are created, lemmy.world and beehaw.org may be able to come together again, at least slightly. For now though, I understand isolating your community to preserve its culture and community.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

I foresee a problem one day in the near future where users from certain instances get referred to links to content that they can't interact with, which... may ruffle a feather or two.

[–] lavendedreams@waveform.social 9 points 1 year ago

Sounds like y'all are taking the steps needed to protect your community, even if it's a bit inconvenient.

[–] satouru@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Aww, that’s a bit sad, but it’s completely understandable and probably the right decision as things stand. :(

Admins, to clarify, which “federation logic/tools” would you need to re-federate with those public/general-purpose instances? Maybe something like:

  • Beehaw users may read and write content on restricted instances,
  • Users from restricted instances cannot read or write content on Beehaw,
  • Unless the user from another instance is manually verified on Beehaw… maybe? But that would be much more complex in terms of development.

Would that be an acceptable solution? If so, I can try to get a look at Lemmy’s code and see if I can implement something like that - although no promises, as I’m currently completely unfamiliar with what lies under the hood of both Lemmy and the Fediverse.

(Not sure who to ping… @alyaza, maybe?)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds as though instances need a permissions or one-way blocking system so that users can still read content while losing their posting priveledges. This would be at the risk of making the whole federation thing even more confusing, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›