this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
615 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
28 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toothbrush@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally think this is the wrong descision. The increased users are basically all coming because of the reddit protest and I think most malicious activity will cease when then the influx of reddit refugees dies down. I dont know about sh.itjust.works, but lemmy.world is well moderated, they are just as much struggling with new users as beehaw is, the only difference is that their moderation happens mostly at the community level. There are a lot of good communities on these servers that are worth keeping around. In my opinion we should be a little more patient with them and at least wait a bit until the reddit chaos dies down, because this situation is largely temporary, but our (temporary) defederation will have permanent chilling effects on all of lemmy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wolfric82@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I see this being a very slippery slope. Part of the nice thing about the fediverse is being able to interact with other communities on other instances. I can easily see Beehaw starting to defederate with more and more instances thereby severely limiting the amount of communities that are accessible. I see the trigger being pulled to defederate from every other instance just to stop any unwanted things from happening.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I easily could see the trigger being pulled to defederate from every other instance just to stop any unwanted things from happening.

i'll be completely honest: i don't know where some of you are earning the confidence to speak more on what this instance will do in the future than us, the actual admins who decide what will be done in the future. i made this point elsewhere, but, to reiterate: if we wanted to defederate from everything we'd legitimately just do that and be done with it. we don't really hide what we intend to do here. the most we've even considered is--if things deteriorate for some reason--switching from an explicit blacklist to a whitelist which would still allow federation with other communities, because we like federation and we want to preserve its good use cases while still being able to minimize the ones we're running into here.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Calvinball@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

I made an account here after reading the mission statement. The very ideals beehaw stands for were the appeal. I support what you are doing, I want this to continue to feel a safe space.

[–] TheSwede@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

While I was subscribers to several .world communities I wholeheartedly agree with this decision. Huge influx of users bringing a lot of reddit meme culture isn't what we need right now.

[–] reverendsteveii@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Love that this instance has decided to stick to its guns and take actions that support the mission as a first priority. The nature of the fediverse is such that anyone who wants the content can still go get it, it's as simple as another bookmark in your browser, and this space can remain bully-free. 100% support this decision, well done.

[–] millionsofplayers@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Only read a section of the post but am i getting it correct that you’re basically defederating because of how many users are on the instances?

For now I disagree with this change because of world being the second biggest lemmy instance but I do understand the reasoning. Seeing how you also manage the third biggest instance this is probably gonna change lemmy as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Started on lemmy.world but came here because of the flood of toxic users over there. Seems like the right call for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sweetholymosiah@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This development reinforces my choice to not sign up @beehaw. The risk of mod over-reach is far more serious than my feelings being hurt because someone wrote a mean spirited comment. So long beehaw mods, I hope your impossible goal to keep the internet free from hatred does not drive you totally insane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ElysiumXII@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Do whatever y’all need to do, appreciate the transparency.

[–] Nicktar@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just to put an additional perspective on this. Beehaw has been and/or had to defederate instances before to become and stay the safe space everyone here's enjoying. The only major difference here is that this time it hit two major instances and not because of actions or goals of the majority of their population or admins but because the sheer size of the instances made the small percentage of their users, who act in what is considered a bad way, made it to much to handle.

According to this list of Awesome Lemmy Instances, there are 5 instances who's count of blocked instances is way above every other instance (like 5 times more). Beehaw is one of those, in fact Beehaw is on top of that list. While this of course isn't desirable, it made the communities we have here possible in first place and helped shape them into what they're now. Just check the blocked instances list.

I think, just closing the valve on certain pipes is a legitimate course of action in a situation where there is more pressure than the receiver can handle, especially in short term while other measures are put into place (like getting better tools to handle the pressure or expecting the general pressure to go down). If the only two options for this valve are "fully open" and "fully closed" it seems to me like the only course of action to prevent overpressure from flooding the whole place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _anarchism_@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

hey thanks for this, its important to keep bigotry out

[–] wispi@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

seems like a good step to take, probably a difficult one for you guys. props to you!

also the incredible transparency is just... breath of fresh air doesn't do it justice

[–] confusedwiseman@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

I want to say thank you, and support the admin team in this decision. I believe this helps keep this community in line with their mantra.

In the spectrum of things, I feel that lemmy.world is closer to the feel of Reddit, not the same, but closer. When I want that, I go there, but I like it here best!

You can see how much crud they filter out for us by going to the communities link at the top of the page, then scrolling all the way to the bottom and clicking instances. Direct link to Beehaw instances

Maybe someday I'll decide to run my own server and determine who I federate with. Until then, I appreciate all their work keeping this community aligned with the sidebar!

[–] owl@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Thank you. I really appreciate what you're trying to build and the work you do. I'm impressed

[–] MeowKittyWow@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Unfortunate, but I understand. I hope the moderation tools improve enough to refederate down the road.

[–] original_ish_name@latte.isnot.coffee 11 points 1 year ago (18 children)

these two instances’ open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;

I'm on an instance that has open registration and I haven't seen any "trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;"

the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;

Sounds like confirmation bias. Can I see actual statistics?

our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;

"safe space" is ambiguous, what are your requirements for a "safe space"

and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt

Sounds like confirmation bias. Can I see actual statistics?

and others of whom simply don’t care about what our instance stands for

Your instance stands for censorship

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] tasbir49@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Hmm

If the issue is mainly moderation tools then here's what I think would be a good way to mitigate bad actors while making the experience seamless for the end user, promotes growth, and doesn't kneecap the fediverse.

  1. Make it so that one can block users from one instance from commenting or posting on an instance. (The users on the former should be notified of this). This way the latter instance is safe and curated.

  2. Add a way to vet users from other instances so that they can participate in the community without having to make a new account. This way, users of good character on other instances can participate in this one without having to make another account. The vetting process can be manual or automated based on factors like account age, if they have an email, etc.

  3. Allow users to block instances entirely. This allows users themselves to have control over what they see.

I don't have much system architect experience but I'll attempt to make a more comprehensive document that takes into account the variety use cases needed in this system after work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MJPsycs@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This was actually my fear when it came to a federated Reddit, I was wondering what was stopping admins from defederating with any instance for any reason, and what would happen when they did. It seemed like communities would become centralised on a few instances, which seemed against the point of a federated internet.

I've since started thinking of this site more as a forum, where you can also access other forums from. And suddenly it clicked as to why I would use this site. And I think Lemmy being hailed as a Reddit replacement has actually done a disservice to its potential.

I do think, however, that there needs to be discussions as a community about what we do and don't want here, and I think the most important one is about what communities we want and how we want to handle them. I don't believe that I was subscribed to any communities on these instances, but I'm sure that there probably would have been some that I would have enjoyed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›