this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
223 points (98.7% liked)

News

23301 readers
3756 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Can we sue Tim Hortons here in Canada as well? Coffee cups and plastic lids everywhere at every intersection and park.

What about the cigarette companies. When I got bored walking down the highway I started counting to ten …. One one thousand, two sing a song …. There’s always a cigarette butt before you get to ten

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it Pepsi's fault that their consumers are assholes?

Maybe make citywide recycling programs clean, easy to use, and accessible?

Heck, Oregon figured this out in 1971 - $0.05 deposit on cans, $0.10 on glass bottles. Recently upped to $0.10 on everything.

Turn the cans and bottles into recycling, get the money back. Taking cans and bottles back to the store was how I went to the movies as a kid.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most other developed countries have done this for decades on end. Unfortunately, in many red states there's an aversion against recycling and cash value for returning. You know, government overreach, yada yada.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, agreed, but this is New York... home of the large soda tax...

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just make the deposit equal to the price of the product.

A three dollar bottle of coke has a three dollar deposit. You get your three dollars back when you take it to a bottle center.

But that would hurt consumer demand. Can't have that!

[–] bratosch@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it's all supposed to be free? The actual soda inside, the machinery for bottling etc. ?

Also, how would free stuff hurt consumer demand? It would hurt income, yes, but not demand .

Also also, do people really need that much of a incentive to throw their shit away at the appropriate place rather than just on the curb?

[–] comador@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Would it be so hard to have cachiers scan a unique code on each product purchased that ties it to the sales receipt?

Law enforcement could use that to track the purchaser and fine them for littering. Absolutely not anything different than now when law enforcement uses receipts found at illegal campsites or illegal dumps and using that the same way.

Just got to force companies to comply.

[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is way too much tracking of my information as it is. I don't need my name tracked every time I buy a coke. Maybe it's time to move on from plastic bottling. Be better to move on to something that is actually recyclable or at least breaks down when disposed.

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

We have cans and they can be recycled infinately.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That does sound hard, and difficult to implement. Better to make the packaging compostable.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh sweet, soda that’s leaking before you even buy it

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yes ending privacy as we know it, to solve litter.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trouble is that the companies packaging is not sustainable and not environmental friendly. Pushing the recycling of this onto consumers is somewhat "unethical" in a sense.

The packing should be fully sustainable, and if not the company's that create the product should have a system in place the receive and properly reuse the packaging or dispose of it in a environment friendly way.

Recycling programs are run by the government payed for by the people and corporations abuse these systems that we pay for with our taxes. Generally creating products that can't be recycled.

I agree people should not litter, but sometimes items are actually disposed of properly, but when garbage crews come by or the litter is on the way to the landfill it flys of the truck and picked up by the wind. Not to mention sometimes open dumpster areas are not the best at keeping garbage and litter contained.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't that avoidable by paying cash? Either that or people can only use card to pay for products with recyclable packaging, which seems severe and kind of authoritarian.