the game we should have had at launch
DLSS, frame-gen and massive CPU/GPU performance boosts
I don't think the performance is Starfield's biggest problem.
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
34 points (78.3% liked)
Gaming
20027 readers
581 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Did the patch make it interesting? Cause that’s what people deserved.
Trash take. Starfields issue was a mediocre world. DLSS is a bonus.
Oh wow, they got rid of the loading screens?
Oh boy! The game we should have had at launch? I can't wait to get in my space ship, take off from a planet, fly to a new one, and land without being forced to fast travel.
I know it's still buggy AF but Star Citizen has had that for years.
Yeah but is it fun?
I think is is, yeah.
fixed title: you can now experience infinite bland empty soulless machine-generated walled sandboxes in more frames per second
Starfield had a lot of issues, and the mid asf performance was a relatively minor one.
Most interested in HDR. Game was super washed out and it was so distracting I stopped playing. Did it improve?
No it doesn't XD