If people feel the need to shoplift, chances are they aren't being provided for by society. I would look to wages and employment first.
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2022
12 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43777 readers
1404 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
In general I'd say no, but in cases of necessity such a defense should be applicable to reduce or alternate the consequences.
Yes, always. Shoplifting from anything but a good worker-owned enterprise is entirely supportable assuming it's not just like a mom and pop with zero employees other than the mom and pop.
The entire existence of capitalism is tightly coupled with mass worker exploitation through the theft of the surplus value generated by workers.
Edit: I don't even care if they aren't in poverty, I still support them, especially from trash like Target.
If a person needs to resort to stealing essential supplies, they're not a failure, it's society that's failing.
It depends on what is being stolen. It's a difference if you steal an essential food item or a bottle of perfume.
Yes, if they are going without food or other essentials.
Yes, it should always be.
And even if someone isn't in poverty, shoplifting is just cool and based.
Only as a mitigating factor if the stolen good is an essential product.
Food and clothing. Other then those, no.