this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
281 points (92.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7120 readers
509 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 42 points 10 months ago

This is the country that thinks it is qualified to police other countries on human rights and freedom of speech 🤡 what a clown country

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Progressives need to leave this dog shit party.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago (13 children)

What we need to do is get rid of FPTP, because so long as that's how the system works breaking away will only guarantee that the fascists win permanently.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They're there to sheepdog the voters into believing progressive candidates a valued part of the democratic party despite the fact that more than most of the good things progressives have accomplished are entirely outside of the chambers of congress. The democrats refuse to work with progressives unless they are forced too, like that time the progressives asked Pelosi to consider stock trading bans and she denied them until it was clear that was horrible PR, then decided to come around to vocally supporting it later, once the political will to pass the bill was dying down. Progressives are there for show.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Yeah, Bernie is demonstrating this by refusing to endorse a ceasefire.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is some bullshit. I don't expect any better from Rs, but 22 Ds?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

AIPAC has heavy stakes in the Democratic Party. They run primary challenges and fund conservatives against anyone who expresses anything close to Palestinian sympathy. (Summer Lee is a good recent/current example.)

Those 22 Ds likely exist at the behest of AIPAC money.

[–] qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

NO, she was censured because she posted a video using a slogan popular with anti semitics, let's get that right. I understand she's trying to appeal to her people but you can't just come out and support hatred from the other side.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

You're being antisemitic by equating anti-zionism with antisemitism.

-someone who's Jewish side of the family was directly affected by the holocaust

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“On May 3, 2022 the ADL website referred to the slogan as, ‘a slogan commonly featured in pro-Palestinian campaigns and chanted at demonstrations.'” he writes. “Nowhere in the 2022 description is there a mention of antisemitism…On October 26, 2023, the position on the website was changed to include, ‘is an antisemitic slogan’.”

Note the date. The slogan wasn't considered antisemitic before October. Don't fall for their bs. Pro-palestine does not mean antisemitic regardless of what these people want you to think.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 11 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Yes and no. If a terrorist group co-opts and reinterprets my national slogan, whose slogan is it? Which interpretation is right? Which interpretation was she using?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (102 children)

Palestine will be free from the river to the sea

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

You know the traditional Palestinian border, but sure anti semitic.....

load more comments (101 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›