I wish so much that this type of headline would end with "Leads to Federal Election Tampering Charges".
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
345 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19107 readers
3023 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm going to be pedantic and technical but it would be state not federal but it would make me very happy to see the DOJ investigate disenfranchisement strategies like this
Larose has been trying to fuck up the election the whole time. Hope they put this piece of shit behind bars. Republicans know they are in the minority and are trying desparately to hang on to power any way they can and rule against the will of the people.
Ohio has been consistently trending red unfortunately. Let's hope this starts the opposite trend.
Please remember we are gerrymandered to the hilt in Ohio. Elections are not reflecting the general populace.
Which is part of my point about republicans clinging on to power by any means necessary.
My understanding is that gerrymandering affects house and state legislature elections. The Senate and ballot initiatives shouldn't be affected by gerrymandering because they aren't decided by drawn districts. Unless I'm mistaken somehow.
You are correct, if elections happened in a vacuum. But disenfranchisement (which is the goal of gerrymandering) has a broader effect on things like voter turnout. So it's more of an indirect effect that drives voter apathy.
Voter apathy is in my opinion the most dangerous thing in American politics
those gerrymandered state legislative elections do affect state-wide votes because those are the people that make their state's election and voter registration laws.
Perhaps there's an indirect influence but you can't argue gerrymandering has the same effect on statewide elections that it has on district races, right?
It does, it has a cooling effect. It takes a lot of voter will to overcome that cooling effect.
I would argue that's the definition of an indirect influence.
Thats my understanding too, well put.
Last I heard they had a ballot initiative to do an independent citizens redistricting council. It's what happened in Michigan to turn it blue and I think some of the same people and elements were behind it down there. If that's still the case it could be more than their right to control women's bodies on the line, which could explain how blatant and desperate this is.
Edit: I looked it up, the state dragged it's feet so it didn't make it on this year. 2024 hopefully!
They should have been ralsed better than that.
I feel this is objectively bad, but I also get called every cycle about Ohio elections and I haven't lived there for 15 years. I would speculate that these voters were purged from more left leaning areas, while I lived in a right. Maybe they just don't care about "safe" right areas?