this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
114 points (96.7% liked)

Games

16752 readers
886 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NanoooK@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you can boost performance by 750% your drivers must have been absolute crap before.

[–] 520@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

It's their first go at non-integrated GPUs. What did you expect?

[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 22 points 1 year ago

S takes. Intel is a new player with a lot less experience creating drivers for dedicated gpus and gaming.

So it's not about beeing "crap".

It's about beeing impressive that they still support their new linup while increasing the competition pressure on amd and nvidia. They are getting better and better with time, amd maybe at one point, or with next gen we'll get competition forcing the 2 old ones to get better pricing.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

They don't have it implemented in silicon but use a translation layer. Of course it's shit at first. And that's ok.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

There's plenty of criticism for Intel as a whole, but their GPUs are an impressive first real attempt. If they continue to improve, we will have far more competition and the breaking of a duopoly. Which is a win for everyone.

Tell us more about how little you know about drivers and GPU performance

[–] filister@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

We most certainly need another GPU vendor to break that hegemony NVIDIA has on the market.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

53% sounds like the new drivers are really good!

750% sounds like the old drivers were shit.

[–] QuarterlySushi@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

For DX11 the old drivers did have MAJOR problems. Maybe at 750% they’re almost good.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This is just for Intel Arc GPU's, is it not?

[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 7 points 1 year ago

Most intel driver news you'll see will most certainly be about the ARC gpus. The integrated gpus not beeing that much worked on for performance and gaming.

[–] junezephier@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article claims:

"This graphics driver applies to both the Intel Arc series discrete GPUs and CPUs with onboard graphics from Intel 11th-gen Tiger Lake, Rocket Lake, and Tiger Lake-H up to 14th-generation CPUs,"

But I'm not sure if the uplifts noted would be seen in the iGPUs

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I would think so just not to the same extent as a dgpu