๐ฅณ 99% of 750,000 responses against it, and they tried to make the train companies say that it was their idea!
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)
United Kingdom
4092 readers
111 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What's the level above omnishambles
Metashambles?
Ultrashambles?
Hypershambles
Probably a clusterfuck.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Transport Secretary Mark Harper said the government had asked train operators to withdraw their proposals because they failed to meet high passenger standards.
But passenger watchdogs Transport Focus and London Travelwatch objected to the proposals, saying they had received 750,000 responses from individuals and organisations in a public consultation.
Announcing the decision to reverse the closures, Mr Harper said the government had made it "clear to the rail industry throughout the process that any resulting proposals must meet a high threshold of serving passengers".
Labour's shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh called it "shambolic" and a "humiliating climbdown", saying the cancelled plans had been "a colossal waste of taxpayers' money".
The planned closures were the latest flashpoint between train companies and unions in their long-running dispute over pay, jobs and working conditions.
Transport for All, a disabled-led organisation, called it "the best possible outcome", but added that while the government was "eventually swayed, it is appalling that disabled people's concerns were dismissed for so long".
The original article contains 593 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Well, rail bosses can get railed by this boss (I'm pointing at my genitals).