this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
150 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5162 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An Indiana Moms for Liberty chapter has followed the conservative group’s national playbook, challenging diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in school districts as part of its “parental rights” mission. But the chapter’s aims and use of a quote from Adolf Hitler in its inaugural newsletter unexpectedly spilled over this fall into a mayor’s race previously defined by local development.

The polarizing nature of Moms for Liberty, which has gained name recognition for its push to pack school boards with its endorsements, has spurred some left-leaning candidates to capitalize on opposition to the group and stir voters against their conservative opponents.

In Carmel, Indiana, the Democratic candidate for mayor has repeatedly used the group when attacking his opponent, even though the mayor’s office has no administrative power over school districts, and the local chapter has publicly remained silent on the race outside of its traditional battleground.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MOL is solidly a hate group and anyone they endorse is a red flag.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

America's brand was Silver Shirts.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Moms For Hitler

I wish people would use the right name

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More accurately, Moms for Privilege. That's what liberty means to them.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You're both right. Hitler was big into white privilege too, actually!

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

imho groups like Moms get funded because the Far Right wants to induce voter fatigue in the rest of us. 'The Gish Gallop' is a debate technique where you throw out so many lies that the other side never gets a chance to make their point; they are too busy refuting BS to actually make a point or advance a program.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And, sadly, it works. If we were debating, I could spew 10 falsehoods in a minute. (Well, theoretically. Lying doesn't come as easily to me as it does to certain folks.) Disproving each one of those would take a few minutes, but by then I've spewed two dozen more lies.

At some point, you need to concede some points - despite them being outright lies - just to try to keep up. Do it enough and the liar can make plenty of their lies seem to be true. After all, if Points 3-10 weren't true, why did you skip from disproving #2 to disproving #11!

It's a DOS attack on the truth.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

(Well, theoretically. Lying doesn’t come as easily to me as it does to certain folks.)

I was reading an article on the 'Trump bucks.' They look like US currency with Trump's picture. Apparently people were buying and trying to cash in like real money. The names of the companies involved were 'USA Patriot' and similar.

They eat their own.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oooh, I love it. I'll have to remember that one. :)

[–] Pacers31Colts18@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Carmel, because of course. What a weird town.

[–] GeminiFrenchFry@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm always a bit weirded out that Carmel makes the news more often than Indy (or so it seems). And totes agree it's a weird place.

[–] tintory@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

TBF Carmel actually does a lot of neat stuff, while other cities is just cUT tAxEs

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

MfL is nothing more than a terrorist fan club.

[–] tintory@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

James Brainard, the current mayor, is probably going to vote Democrat this time around, because Moms of Liberty are 100% against all of this policies despite him being a republican

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Moms for Fascism is "polarizing".

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


(AP) — An Indiana Moms for Liberty chapter has followed the conservative group’s national playbook, challenging diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in school districts as part of its “parental rights” mission.

But the chapter’s aims and use of a quote from Adolf Hitler in its inaugural newsletter unexpectedly spilled over this fall into a mayor’s race previously defined by local development.

The polarizing nature of Moms for Liberty, which has gained name recognition for its push to pack school boards with its endorsements, has spurred some left-leaning candidates to capitalize on opposition to the group and stir voters against their conservative opponents.

Democratic candidate and Carmel city councilman Miles Nelson asked his opponent on stage earlier this month to denounce the local Moms for Liberty chapter.

The Hamilton County chapter of Moms for Liberty told The Associated Press it can only endorse candidates for school board, but also accused Nelson of campaigning on “silencing parents.”

Jon Valant, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution, said while Moms for Liberty has rallied a base to its cause, the group also has generated staunch opposition.


The original article contains 952 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!