this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1 points (54.5% liked)

Hacker News

4122 readers
2 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

To continue with this story please make an account.

Sign in with facebook, google, twitter, or a blood pact to continue

[–] dr_scientist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] brettvitaz@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

The robot doesn’t believe that I am not a robot and won’t let me in.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not a single mention of how dangerous handling anhydrous ammonia is. This article completely lacks anything resembling responsible journalism.

[–] black_mouflon@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair to them, that company already made safe hydrogen powered vehicles. They probably know the dangers.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sure the engineers on the project know the dangers, but to not at all adress it when talking about wide spread adoption is neglectful. Ammonia vapors can cause your lungs to fill with fluid and you drown. Skin contact causes severe chemical burns. Certainly consumers would want to know what kind of safety systems are planned before considering handling this substance on a regular basis. I wouldn't be complaining if they were just talking about cool demonstration vehicles. The claim is that widespread adoption is expected.