i mean TECHNICALLY it is more secure to not be able to sideload apps... at the cost of major user freedom and loss of control over your own device you paid money for.

its the equivalent of saying "you should never use the internet at all because there's a chance you could get a virus", its an extremely flawed logic. i think the user should always be given a choice.

apple will definitely lose money from this and i think that's their concern with having to allow sideloading, definitely moreso than privacy or security lol. apple previously has been able to monopolize and take a commission on every single app purchase or microtransaction thanks to the app store. if people sideload or use alternate app stores, apple will lose this. + some advertising revenue will be lost if sideloaded apps aren't using apple's advertising platform, etc.

[–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Also if you are scared just don't sideload

[–] aroom@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you might be confusing the total user base with people commenting on MacRumours

[–] 10_0@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The change will lose you money: PANIC

[–] aRatherDapperFox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's be real, it's not even that the changes will lose corporations money, it's that the changes will lower their disgustingly bloated earnings by a marginal amount that makes them panic.

[–] original_ish_name@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or the shareholders think the change will make them lose money

[–] aRatherDapperFox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Or the shareholders consider every potential ¢ left on the table (no matter why) the same as losing that money, no matter how much money they're already making. Que that song from The Greatest Showman:

🎶 All the shine of a thousand spotlights

🎵 All the stars we steal from the nightsky

🎶 Will never be enough

🎵 Never be enough

🎶 Towers of gold are still too little

🎵 These hands could hold the world but it'll

🎶 Never be enough

🎵 Never be enough

[–] original_ish_name@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

🎶 All the shine of a thousand users

🎵 All the money we steal from the sheeple

🎶 Will never be enough

🎵 Never be enough

🎶 Towers of data are still too little

🎵 This mind could track the world but it'll

🎶 Never be enough

🎵 Never be enough

[–] metaltoilet@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

And now they've made a headset... of course.

Dear got I hope they don't become the norm the way the iphone did. I hate VR

[–] elouboub@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Alright, how many people here use their crap? Come out of the woodwork and confess your sins.

[–] original_ish_name@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I got a macbook for free because it was broken. I don't know how but I fixed it. Currently trying to port coreboot

[–] Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You know what, I'm gonna say it. I do enjoy working on MacBook when I'm away from home and I think the iPad Pro 12.9 is an excellent tablet.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if I like this change. Not allowing for sideloading means a reduction in user freedom, sure, but how much freedom does the average user care to have anyway? With the state of Apple products as it is today, I would definitely recommend them to someone who isn't technologically savvy over something that grants more freedoms because of how fool-proof it is. For the rest of us who know our way around this stuff, we have Linux. The lack of freedom in Apple products doesn't take away from the freedoms of Linux users.

[–] zekiz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a EU law now that forces Apple to allow sideloading in the EU. Common EU W

They have no obligations to allow that outside of the EU though.

load more comments