this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2023
80 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
929 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
80
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

wtf

Edit: Apparently this is satire or an art project

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Connor717@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s a shame so many people are being so annoying with AI. There are so many genuinely incredible possibilities.

[–] Spidertax@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

agreed. in the case of AI art, there are some legitimate artists out there (Rob Sheridan comes to mind) who are making wonderful use of AI image generation tools and incorporating it into their artwork and it's SO cool.

it's a shame that so far the loudest people touting AI are the annoying "bro buy my latest shitcoin" techbros.

[–] limeaide@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why does every tech bro want to replace things thay make people happy, like art with AI?? It's so confusing tbh

I thought things like low level customer service or menial tasks would make sense to replace first

[–] DudePluto@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why does every tech bro want to replace things thay make people happy, like art

Because AI is funded and headed by corporations seeking profit. And things like art require skilled labor, which is expensive. Therefore if you can create a machine that reduces the skill required to produce something like art, you can pay the human less. Or maybe even remove the human entirely.

AI will only - can only - benefit the people if it is headed and regulated by the people and for the people. As it is, it is only a tool of the ultra wealthy, and tech bros are totally falling for the bait and switch

[–] Spacebar@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because they don't have the artistic skill themselves and they are parasitic by nature? So they latch onto a tool that itself is a parasite?

[–] limeaide@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

How boring and dystopian would the world be without people creating art and instead it being created for profit by art instead of passion and love. I mean it already happens, but at least you need some talent to be successful lol

In the future where AI makes all the music, I will become one of those old ppl commenting on rap youtube videos, "back music was art and beautiful" lmaoo

[–] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This type of extravagant technological solution feels like something Aperture Science would make

[–] _cnt0@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

We do what we must because we can.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Cave Johnson, we're done here.

[–] k_o_t@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

y’all mfs trying to detect obvious satire challenge (impossible)

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] jstsmthrgk@lemmy.jstsmthrgk.eu 2 points 2 years ago

Well, the camera itself is just an art project.

But I have no idea if the person who posted it with that text is delusional or trying to be funny.

[–] k_o_t@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I corrected the title and post!

[–] TheBelgian@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

actually, Google was really working on something like this, based on googlestreet images, gps, accelerometer, time, AI etc... to deduce the image and sell cameraless smartphone.

what a stupid idea, honestly

  1. because it is indeed stupid: the most inefficient way to provide an existing and cheap feature
  2. cameras are actually the selling point of most the expensive smartphone
  3. I WANT to capture it myself
[–] AbelianGrape@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

This is one of those "it's cool!" things that people took way too far

[–] cnx 1 points 2 years ago

most inefficient way to provide an existing and cheap feature

Ah yes, because the whole so-called innovations on handheld computer/camera are about making efficient use of resources and totally have nothing to do with making as much money as possible!

I WANT to capture it myself

Speak for yourself, similar tech's already been commercialized.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Looks like a lot of unnecessary extra steps for worse effect.

It is incredibly ironic though because back in the days photography was attacked as the thing that would "destroy art".

[–] Erose543@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

I want to capture the thing I'm looking at. Art is an attempt to convey personal experience to another person with an unknowable other experience. Having the basis of art be other people's art without at least personal control of the end composition is just all backwards. Not to mention that's not a camera, it's literally a different thing. These people get me so flustered

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@sexy_peach what if the AI doesn't already have the image 👀 ?

[–] schizanon@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] cnx 1 points 2 years ago

It does require each feature to be part of the training dataset to compose the result. Even better, the state-of-the-art stochastic models can output identical data but you can completely ignore the original work's license. Yeah science, bitch!

[–] Npenplz@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I can't imagine anyone other than tech bros actually using this in any scenario

[–] zekiz@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

It's a cool art project.

[–] MrsEaves@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

AI image generation aside, this sort of thing might be genuinely useful for someone who is blind or low vision. It’s like alt text for the world.

[–] taaz@biglemmowski.win 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thought this is an invention for blind people at first.

[–] iuseit@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

Someone please kill me

load more comments
view more: next ›