this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
33 points (94.6% liked)

Seattle

1577 readers
7 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Copied for the lazy

Hours after Seattle’s new law against public drug use and drug possession took effect Friday, police officers swept through two neighborhoods and made about two dozen arrests, police Chief Adrian Diaz said.

Police handed out flyers Friday morning in an effort to educate people about the controversial new law, then returned Friday afternoon to enforce the gross misdemeanor offenses, Diaz said in a news conference at the Seattle Police Department headquarters.

The operations targeted the vicinity of 12th Avenue South and South Jackson Street in the Chinatown International District’s Little Saigon neighborhood and Third Avenue and Pine Street in downtown. Both areas have seen prominent public drug use for years.

Ten people were put into jail, mostly on outstanding felony warrants for offenses that included rape, domestic violence and assault, Diaz said. Two of the 10 were jailed on new offenses, including possession of drugs with intent to deliver and possession of a stolen firearm, the chief said. Police “might not have come into contact” with the suspects if not for the new drug law, he said.

An additional 15 people who were arrested were almost immediately referred to case workers, and 13 accepted those referrals, Diaz said. Some people were released directly from an SPD precinct, without going to jail, he said.

Deputy Mayor Tim Burgess later described the arrest and referral numbers that Diaz shared as preliminary and subject to change.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

There's more after that ad space.

New law is essentially they can now charge possession or public use as a misdemeanor instead of a felony and are targeting people using in public.

I'm no fan of the war on drugs but I will reserve judgment on this for a later time to see how this goes. Leaning towards not having a problem with it.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ten people were put into jail, mostly on outstanding felony warrants for offenses that included rape, domestic violence and assault, Diaz said. Two of the 10 were jailed on new offenses, including possession of drugs with intent to deliver and possession of a stolen firearm, the chief said. Police “might not have come into contact” with the suspects if not for the new drug law, he said.

So... 8 out of 10 of the people arrested were not arrested for drug charges, but for existing felony warrants. If they were only contacted because of the new law, shouldn't there have been clear evidence that they were also using or possessing illegal drugs? Or are they just admitting that they openly accosted everyone in the area regardless of reasonable suspicion?

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sound like someone who understands how law enforcement works.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

I certainly try to understand how the 4th amendment works. Sadly I think most people stopped paying attention after 2.

[–] tenextrathrills@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Do Ballard next!