this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1026 points (95.9% liked)

Anarchist Memes

1200 readers
1 users here now

This forum is for anarchists to circlejerk and share zesty memes

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jordan_U@lemmy.ml 78 points 1 year ago (5 children)

ITT:

Everyone thinking that the only two options are being quiet or being violent.

Strikes are currently making those in power very uncomfortable, and are resulting in genuine progress for workers.

In my area, people camping out in thousand year old trees has protected them time and again from being illegally logged.

Black Lives Matter protests were loud and made the powerful uncomfortable, and despite media narratives it wasn't "violent protesters" that made the powerful uncomfortable.

It is true that any form of protest that is loud and inconveniencing enough to actually be productive will be met with state violence.

It's also true that some working for progress do use violence. But make no mistake, it's not guns that made those in power uncomfortable when it came to Malcom X and the Black Panthers.

The most radical and intimidating (to those in power) things the Black Panthers did were to give free food to schoolchildren, and free healthcare at their People’s Free Medical Clinics.

Building community and mutual aid is subversive.

Building community and mutual aid makes those in power uncomfortable.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Building community and mutual aid is subversive.

This. Both the government and the major corporations depend on being able to extract wealth from real people getting what they need. If we build dual power structures, help one another out and cut the owner class out of the transaction entirely, we weaken them. Growing food in your garden is revolutionary. Clothing swaps are revolutionary. Cutting the old lady next door's lawn, then eating the soup she made is an act that strikes at the fundamental underpinnings of the power structure set up by those who think that they should be entitled to our labor because they've been arbitrarily designated as the "owners" of things. We can and should remove them from the equation entirely.

If you wrote a book I'd read it.

[–] Cookiesandcreamclouds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why wasn't I taught about the free food and medical care part of what they did?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Building community and mutual aid makes those in power uncomfortable.

Small mutual aid for local communities grow out into large social aid organizations that have political power. Politicians can make them redundant by unemployment, healthcare and pensions, or try to nip them in the bud.

[–] Jordan_U@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Politicians can try.

That can't stop us from trying though.

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Socialism bad! Sending people to die in wars good!

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The entirety of history also shows that a whole lot of people need to be ready to die for the cause for social change to happen.

So, still feeling up for it?

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That is the question:

live in an unjust and amoral society

or die trying to make a righteous one.

The stoics, at least Seneca, opted for the former.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He really wasn't given much of a choice. He just chose his stance on the one option he had.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seneca was one of the wealthiest Romans of his time.

He more than 99% of the Empire had a choice. He happened to be rich and choose status quo. Who ever would have guessed that ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Promethiel@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Far more people than you seem to think so are feeling up to it, risk of bodily harm nonwithstanding. That same history shows that whole lots of people do and have gotten that fed up.

The current challenge imo is the hyperfocused and extremely well funded tools to disorganize and fracture populaces globally.

They are so abstract, so psychologically targeted and so pervasive that they enable the rise of fascism again even though many of the players are frankly cartoonishly inept (more so than in the past; fascism is cunning and bullish, but seldom clever) to the point that the banality of evil of yesterday is nearly preferable to the bumbling cruelty of today.

Yes, still feeling up to it, but while the precipice nears, there's still both time to turn the car around and get ready to violently brake. We're just careful drivers until there's a need to maneuver.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Joke's on you, I already wish I was dead

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

When doing nothing becomes so intolerable and the potential gain is high enough to make the risk of death is worth taking then the answer becomes "yes". That's why people don't take extreme actions easily.

Putting it another way, if enough people are willing to take big risks, then the status quo must be pretty damned awful in their view.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

They're gonna kill me if I don't

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Squeaky wheel gets the grease

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Exactly. The louder and more obnoxious you are, particularly towards those in power, the more likely they are to actually listen, even if just to get you to fuck off

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago

Reasonableness is for the status quo.

People didn't get their rights asking for them nicely.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Look at the US, they begged England for representation. Even after they gave an ultimatum they begged to stay but it didn’t work and they had a war that France won

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

This reminds me of the Douglas Adams thing from ‘last chance to see’

[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

It depends on the kind of change you are attempting to make. Revolutionary changes aren't going to be accomplished without someone getting hurt, but if you are trying to change the name of your town from Lincolnville to Frankville that likely won't require injury.

[–] oroboros@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Very effective gaslighting by those in power.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's amazing how a perspective can change when one's head is rolling around on the cobblestone.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

context required...

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It also comes with a big body count on both sides.

[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

It doesn't have to have a high body count on one side, there aren't many at the top holding the rest of the world back because they only care about stock prices and shareholder value.

load more comments
view more: next ›