this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
74 points (95.1% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

33 readers
1 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Non paywalled link: https://archive.ph/IKzXb

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Javish@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think I’m gonna like this.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Feels like the beginning of the end, doesn't it. Interesting original content will have to give way for commercial mainstream appeal.

[–] Hallowed_Grave@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I agree. I love A24 for the independent movies. Movies that would’ve never gotten a chance anywhere else.

At the very least, it could tarnish the A24 brand and end up like Blumhouse, producing these “legacy sequels” to movies that didn’t really need a (another) sequel to begin with.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago

It feels like A24 is deploying the same singles and doubles strategy that Eisner is deploying when he took over Disney.

Small movies can take creative risks, but they are at the size where their movies can start to compete beyond art house theaters.

[–] Javish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This feels like a continuation of the enshitification of everything lately.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This word is losing more and more meaning with every passing day.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Or maybe it's just becoming more and more prevalent.

[–] rephlekt2718@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Fuck. I mean, let’s wait and see, but def doesn’t sound good from here.

[–] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure how I feel about this. But I think we'd be mistaken if we assume that A24 movies are so good just because they're arthouse films.

[–] eutsgueden@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Of course, arthouse does not automatically equal good. They're good movies because they're good ideas from people with a vision, and A24 gave these people funding and a platform for their vision, (seemingly) without asking them to make compromises for the sake of profit. This new strategy could take that away.

People will always find ways to make their arthouse movies. The difference is A24 made them easy to find and arguably popular.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago
[–] bakachu@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

So it sounds like this is a profit-driven decision with auteur dramas in general just not being as profitable as action films or films that have some element of action.

Kind of a radical idea, but I always wondered if the movie industry would do better with different pricing models. When people go to the movies nowadays it seems like its just a better deal over all to see something big budget (even though it may not be an especially good storyline). So maybe just so we can get more variety out of it, they price accordingly and see how the market reacts?

[–] doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Who can blame a sell-out, right?

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

On one hand, I'm a little sad, on the other hand, I'm interested if they do it differently. Time will tell.

Makes sense, have to fund it somehow.