this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
108 points (96.6% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2398 readers
96 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

!abolition@slrpnk.net

!acab@lemmygrad.ml

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Rapist cop disarmed, fired and jailed. JK

[–] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago
[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I get accusations are not the same as a conviction but he shouldn’t be on patrol until cleared.

Give him his pay and take away his firearms. That’s fair.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Now hold on.

Give him his pay for doing no work? Absolutely not.

Put him behind a desk and he can be a paper pusher until things are cleared up. That’s already leaps and bounds more generous than most people get.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If the allegations are true, that means we had a rapist interacting with the community and dealing with sensitive information.

He needs to be out of the department until cleared.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m explicitly suggesting he gets thrown into a place where he gets paid to do menial and meaningless work.

If this takes many months to clear up, and he is found guilty, he essentially got an extended paid vacation.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No way, paperwork is still important and could be manipulated, leave is the best course of action imo.

Also being in the office at all can cause problems for both his reputation (if ultimately found innocent) and how other people feel.

If the work is meaningless then it's just wasteful anyway and shouldn't be done in the first place. If the work is meaningful, it shouldn't be done by someone under investigation.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Then send him home without pay. Still better than most who would be fired on the spot.

Getting paid for an extended vacation when accused of wrongdoing is bullshit. Just because he’s a cop shouldn’t give him special treatment.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Why not change the way other professions handle it.

Make it better for everyone instead of dragging the rest down.

To add, the reason police have protections like this is because they have strong unions, the unions protect the workers. That is something that other jobs can also do, this isn't a law, it's a result of a negotiation.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The reason police forces can do this is because they are over funded with tax payer money. You think they actually pay attention to their bottom line? They literally buy military equipment with their surplus.

“Free paid vacation” is an extreme problem with police. You already said they are different, in that their work can be extremely sensitive. The stock boy at Walmart deals with… random items.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Cops don't have "better unions," they have criminal unions. They're not like other unions — much more powerful, protective of active criminals long as they have a badge — and deserve no support, no matter how pro-union anyone might be.

The root problem: Police are nearly worshipped in American society, to the point that not giving them everything they ask for is considered "weak on crime," and can cost the Mayor his/her job.

Pretending they're a union like other unions makes the problem worse.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. He would still have access to a firearm, powers of arrest and confidential information.

It could take years to clean up but he should be denied all access to police resources and power until he is cleared. It is the safe and smart thing to do.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago

So make him a janitor, or a crossing guard. There are a lot of tasks one can do for the city that don’t come with access or power beyond that of a normal citizen.

[–] saltedFish@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago