I know people don't really like systemd much but goddamn if systemd-boot isn't easier to work with than grub. On my last two Arch installs I've used systemd-boot and I have absolutely no complaints. I don't alway need an entire mini OS to boot my kernel.
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
102 points (99.0% liked)
Linux
48216 readers
1351 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I concur with this. Glad to see that Tumbleweed is offering it OOTB now, as I believe the only two choices prior to this (if you wanted it setup out of the box) was Arch and NixOS.
Edit: As pointed out below, Pop_OS! also supports systemd-boot OOTB, not sure how I forgot about it as that was my first exposure to systemd-boot.
Pop os uses systemd boot ootb
Ah I don't know how I forgot about Pop! Pop was actually the first distro I used that had systemd-boot OOTB, and I've loved it since then.
Haven't been on Pop for a while, but I'm definitely looking forward to giving it another go once the new Cosmic desktop is finished!
Systemd-boot didn't start as part of systemd, it used to be gummiboot (joke in German, it's what those little rubber inflatible boats are called).
Systemd absorbed and integrated it in 2015.
It did start at RedHat with Kay Sievers and Harald Hoyer, which makes it unsurprising it was absorbed.
I've been transitioning to it as my default choice, I've never liked grub2, so I defaulted to syslinux for a long time, but lately systemd-boot is even less of a hassle.
I don't like systemd at all, but a boot routine that allows to load the plain kernel instead of an image and maybe choose other init systems than systemd would be nice. This is how most other Unix-like systems work.
Starting the init system is the task of the root filesystem or initrd, with any boot loader. Systemd-boot happily boot into any init system just fine, just like any other bootloader that can boot Linux will boot into systemd just fine.
Systemd-boot boots kernel images (with efi-loader code embedded) and only offers a menu to pick which kernel file to load. What makes systemd-boot interesting is that it does nothing more than that: It does not read random filesystems, it does not implement random encryption things, does not parse image files and complex theme configuration, ... .
How can I convert from grub to systemd on existing install? Will I still have access to snapshots?
Really excited to finally get away from grub on fantastic os.