this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7200 readers
384 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOOD! Though I can see this going to court, the properties were already bought prior to the decision to open them up, and that decision was of course appears based on a bunch of sketchy dealings.

Can't develop the property now? Nothing's changed since when they bought it.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dear Judge, I made a corrupt backroom deal that I was hoping would make me a lot of money, however my unscrupulousness was uncovered and plan was thwarted. Please pay me anyway, since I would have got away with it if it weren't for these meddling kids.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Was there some reason to think that they needed to be?

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 9 points 1 year ago

Because doug ford uses the government as a piggy bank for his shitty friends, and that's the only reason he'd cancel the deal.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Because Ford said they were looking into doing it

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 22 points 1 year ago

Thank fucking god

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good move, hope they stand their ground on this decision.

Developers definitely should not be compensated if the land was bought at the same value it was/is.

[–] SwampTerror@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They will likely sue, which will mean we pay again.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Sue for what? They bought some land. That land is in their possession.

I don't think a corrupt backroom deal falling through is grounds for damages.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They better get sued by the original owners in turn. And then those owners will sue the government so we can pay again. The circle of jerk.

[–] mosscap 18 points 1 year ago

Good. Fuck em.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah just wait. Once this whole thing dies down Ford will sneak in some of those back onto the table for development.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, this is ultimately what it means, which means serious effort needs to be made to not let this die down.

Serious effort that I don't believe will happen, as efforts would need to be constantly escalating to remain in the news cycle.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

They rezoned outside the green belt but didn’t undo that

Developers still made out well