Ewww default exports. Explicit named exports are better! And so it begins
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
510 points (93.1% liked)
Programmer Humor
32070 readers
450 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
How very dare you share my opinion!
PascalCase default exports for Classes
camelCase named exports for functions
ALL_CAPS named exports for constants
How about some fun?
How about some fn instead?
pub async fn foo() -> Pin>>>>>
oh fuck commonmark cant display the syntax :( well anyone who has done async rust can imagine
p a f fn(){}
load more comments
(2 replies)
these puns are getting funcy
load more comments
(2 replies)
fun is the punchable face of keywords. I don't know why, but I hate it.
Oh, you're no fun.
^I'll see myself out.^
For me it's friend
I prefer good old def
How about some (defun)?
better than function
load more comments
(1 replies)
Python is fine as a language I guess
But python programmers give it a bad name. I've never seen "well written" python code, it's always shit that's been thrown together cos it works.
I use python exclusively when I want to quickly throw some shit together that nobody's ever gonna spend any time maintaining, so that tracks.
It badly needs strong typing. And braces.
Doesn't Python 3 have types? I've seen a few well typed codebases and it really made the code much easier to understand. Or is it just that it's not checking them strongly enough?
The type annotations are just fancy comments. They do not do anything at runtime. If you have a function that takes an int someone can still pass in a list or anything else.
The main advantage of typing for me is static linting.
But will it run? I'm used to typescript where it's not checked at runtime but you can't "build" unsafe types I'd assume it's the same here
load more comments
(1 replies)
I think python is good as it is for what it can do, mostly because I have no reason to use it.
What we need is lua with types!
Have you heard of Typescript-to-lua? I used to do Dota modding (which is in lua) with TSTL and it works great!
You write TS code (using Typescript syntax that includes types) and it is compiled into lua.
Wonder if that could be an alternative that can work for you.
load more comments
(2 replies)
just put int_ or str_ in front of your variables
problem solved 😌
When the grey beards wake up they're going to be fuming
view more: next ›